Page 1 of 3
Tom Hanks reply but no success
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:33 pm
by tresdoll
Hi everyone,
In late March 2014 I sent a photo, letter and SASE to Tom Hanks at the Playtone address. Today, I received my photo and letter back, with a reproduced note stating that he is currently out of the country and "for the remainder of 2014, my time is not my own."
I'm happy they took the time to return my photo. I received a success from him several years ago, so this makes he hopeful that his TTM successes are genuine.
Re: Tom Hanks reply but no success
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:43 pm
by magicmanplc
I sent to him early last year and have heard nothing since. I also already got him once but not through that address.
Re: Tom Hanks reply but no success
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:47 pm
by magicmanplc
Daniel97 wrote:magicmanplc wrote:I sent to him early last year and have heard nothing since. I also already got him once but not through that address.
What address did you get his autograph ?
The address I used is no longer valid. I got it sometime last year.
Re: Tom Hanks reply but no success
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:58 pm
by admin
Hi tresdoll
Thank you for your feedback
Would you have a scan of the envelope and letter you received please?
If so, you are in the run for the $10 gift certificate.
Tom Hanks on Fanmail.biz |
Previous Feedback(s) Received
Fanmail
Re: Tom Hanks reply but no success
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 9:12 pm
by magicmanplc
Ok thanks for nothing. I won't bother you again sir. Have a nice night.
You didn't bother me.
Re: Tom Hanks reply but no success
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:22 am
by Baggiebubs
Lady's hand bags away
Re: Tom Hanks reply but no success
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:48 am
by vivalakayla
Daniel97 wrote:magicmanplc wrote:
What address did you get his autograph ?
The address I used is no longer valid. I got it sometime last year.
Ok thanks for nothing. I won't bother you again sir. Have a nice night.[/quote]
No need to be rude, Daniel. Most likely it was a venue address which is literally no longer valid. I'm sure he wasn't trying to keep anything from you!
Re: Tom Hanks reply but no success
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 3:50 am
by MW1221
vivalakayla wrote:Daniel97 wrote:magicmanplc wrote:
The address I used is no longer valid. I got it sometime last year.
Ok thanks for nothing. I won't bother you again sir. Have a nice night.
No need to be rude, Daniel. Most likely it was a venue address which is literally no longer valid. I'm sure he wasn't trying to keep anything from you!
I think he just meant that it's just kind of a brag to respond to a failure by saying "I got him from a different address, but you can't, since the address is outdated."
What's the value in that?
Re: Tom Hanks reply but no success
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 11:10 am
by magicmanplc
It was a venue address which is really no longer valid. All I was saying is that I had a success from him. I wasn't trying to be rude or brag about it. I'm not trying to keep anything from you.
Re: Tom Hanks reply but no success
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 9:11 pm
by MW1221
magicmanplc wrote:It was a venue address which is really no longer valid. All I was saying is that I had a success from him. I wasn't trying to be rude or brag about it. I'm not trying to keep anything from you.
What are people supposed to do with that information? Give you an award?
So sorry for your failure, but hey, at least I got one years ago!
Congratulations, I guess.