rec: my card unsigned, pic signed (maybe PP -I don't know) + note: he is so busy... (17.jun.2013.)
addr: Richard Armitage, United Agents Ltd., 12-26 Lexington Street, London, W1F 0LE, UK


mine:

yours:





WHAT DO YOU THINK???
You might want to check your grammar... Or did you seriously think they are secretarials???!!! Richard NEVER EVER does secretarials. And when people sign their name, there will always be a slight difference between on signature and another... My handwriting/neatness changes all the time, it's annoying.luckyas13canbe wrote:They are SO obviously different it's not true.
Wait? You mean that genuine signatures are NEVER identical? How can this be? My entire understanding of this has turned on it's axis? Wait... does this mean that Planet of the Apes really DID happen and Bill Clinton did not have relations with Monica Lewinsky? I mean, if signatures are never identical, then anything could be true.ElfMaidenArcher wrote:You might want to check your grammar... Or did you seriously think they are secretarials???!!! Richard NEVER EVER does secretarials. And when people sign their name, there will always be a slight difference between on signature and another... My handwriting/neatness changes all the time, it's annoying.luckyas13canbe wrote:They are SO obviously different it's not true.
Congrats OP! Those are pre-signed...not pre-prints... Obviously, pre-prints would look EXACTLY alike and look as if nobody actually used a real Sharpie.
He's only doing this because he's busy filming until August.
Sorry, man. I believe I misunderstood your previous post or it did not convey very clearly. What I thought you meant by "They are SO obviously different it's not true" was "They are so obviously different it's not a real/authentic autograph".luckyas13canbe wrote:Wait? You mean that genuine signatures are NEVER identical? How can this be? My entire understanding of this has turned on it's axis? Wait... does this mean that Planet of the Apes really DID happen and Bill Clinton did not have relations with Monica Lewinsky? I mean, if signatures are never identical, then anything could be true.ElfMaidenArcher wrote:You might want to check your grammar... Or did you seriously think they are secretarials???!!! Richard NEVER EVER does secretarials. And when people sign their name, there will always be a slight difference between on signature and another... My handwriting/neatness changes all the time, it's annoying.luckyas13canbe wrote:They are SO obviously different it's not true.
Congrats OP! Those are pre-signed...not pre-prints... Obviously, pre-prints would look EXACTLY alike and look as if nobody actually used a real Sharpie.
He's only doing this because he's busy filming until August.
Oh wait....
Grammar not top of my list when I have had less than three hours sleep in two days. As you well know, it clearly states the signatures are different, and as such cannot be preprints. At no point there did I claim that them being different was a negative fact in terms of authenticity. For the record, I have had more of my items returned signed by Richard in the last couple of years than the majority of this forum combined, so no, under no circumstances did I suggest this was anything but genuine.
Glad to know you made up for your lack of sleep.luckyas13canbe wrote:muhahah, never any hard feelings, i was being extremely sarcastic in my response ;) totally in agreement with your comments on signature differences there. in actual fact these presigned ones are better than what sometimes goes out as when richard signs what comes in he sometimes switches to a "r armitage" rather than full signature.
delighted to report 3 hours sleep bagged
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests