HappinessStan wrote:Congratulations! (no pun intended)
It seems a bit odd that he should go from not signing anything for a long time to sending out again. Also, even though the sig looks pretty close to examples I've seen, it does look a lot smaller than it used to be.
It's only a gut feeling, and I hope that I'm wrong, but I'm slightly suspicious about these and the one which was posted the other day. Please don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to be all negative, or kick off another John Travolta style four-page argument, but wonder if anyone else has any thoughts either way on Sir Cliff's authenticity?
Hi and thanks for your comment. His sig is in fact pretty small, but I'm quite confident they're authentic. Comparing them to other autographs - even earlier ones - his sig looks similar. However, I'm not 100% sure but I do hope they are authentic.
Any other opinions?