Jaffer wrote:vivalakayla wrote:Hmm, The writing on the card looks like the one on the back of the pic that was supposed to get sent to me but was sent to someone else. The one about Louisville. Do you think the writing is sec on that, too? Would that mean her sec was with her on the movie set?
Yes, your note seemed to be a sec :s Was your response postmarked from Kentucky?
IDK, someone from NZ got my success, remember? =(
I honestly think the handwriting on your cards is the exact same handwriting on the back of my photo that that user recieved. It's incredibly messy and looks the same. If that's sec, I am sure yours are. It matches up more to that handwriting then it does to Angie's pictures.
The handwriting to Angie's photos is bubbly, and she writes cursive/print. None of the writing on your card is cursive/print like that. The Y's are not the same, either. & on the T's she has hooks, on your card it doesn't. Her U's on Ange's she has a hook but on your cards it's just written U with no hook. Her N's on Angie's picture are more pointy. The ones are your card are rounded. I think there are alot more differences than there are similarities.
Also the actual signature, is again very bubbly and very pushed together. The one you recieved on your photos are not bubbly at all and very spaced out between letters & scribbly.
If anything, I think they are all secs and none of them authentic TTM.
I do realize there are many differences in writing, but I don't think it would be that much.