Rachel Wilde Q+A success

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Rachel Wilde Q+A success

Re: Rachel Wilde Q+A success

by shaun » Mon Nov 03, 2014 7:48 pm

Oh right :lol: no problem at all, i can get like that a bit too. :lol:

Re: Rachel Wilde Q+A success

by Ashjackson » Mon Nov 03, 2014 7:23 pm

shaun wrote:On my SAE's i always put a stamp, and have never not put a stamp on.
That makes it a SASE then lol but wasn't really talking about you just kind of strayed as have seen that on here a lot.

Re: Rachel Wilde Q+A success

by shaun » Mon Nov 03, 2014 7:05 pm

On my SAE's i always put a stamp, and have never not put a stamp on.

Re: Rachel Wilde Q+A success

by Gwynethdestiny » Mon Nov 03, 2014 6:53 pm

Ashjackson wrote:I can never see the silly little pictures anyway as there seems to be some sort of content lock on them and completely agree these Q&A's seem completely pointless.
Ashjackson wrote:on another note why are people on this site so quick to jump into negative comments?.
:D

Re: Rachel Wilde Q+A success

by Gwynethdestiny » Mon Nov 03, 2014 6:53 pm

Ashjackson wrote:Especially when they don't even bother putting a stamp on the envelope and expect them to pay for the postage.

Ashjackson wrote:on another note why are people on this site so quick to jump into negative comments?.


:D

Re: Rachel Wilde Q+A success

by Ashjackson » Mon Nov 03, 2014 6:31 pm

Especially when they don't even bother putting a stamp on the envelope and expect them to pay for the postage.

Re: Rachel Wilde Q+A success

by carlosreddevil » Mon Nov 03, 2014 2:40 pm

This is the problem with this site at the moment. Someone posts something like 'Got a signed picture of Ghandi in the post today' - no picture, no proof, everyone rallies round to congratulate them. Add a little objective opinion to a post (as already mentioned, it's someone's opinion and they're entitled to it) everyone loses their mind!

While I'm on the subject (and this is my opinion) but I am dead against this practice of printing off millions of copies of the same letter stating 'Dear __ (fill name in here)__. I am a big fan. Sign below'. Where has the personal touch in autograph collecting gone?

Re: Rachel Wilde Q+A success

by Ashjackson » Mon Nov 03, 2014 1:43 pm

Lisasautographs. wrote:
Ashjackson wrote:I can never see the silly little pictures anyway as there seems to be some sort of content lock on them and completely agree these Q&A's seem completely pointless.
Silly little pictures? If you can't see them how come do you know they are silly. ?
Simple thing to do is if you can't see them is not to click on Shaun's topics especially if you have nothing nice to say.
And if Shaun wants to send question and answers and he's happy with that then it has got nothing to do with you.
I did say seem pointless as in to me as it is my opinion which I am entitled to. I can see the pictures but can't click on them so why not just post them bigger in the first place? Anyway this doesn't have to turn into a long debate like most of the posts on here.

Re: Rachel Wilde Q+A success

by Lisasautographs. » Mon Nov 03, 2014 12:36 pm

Ashjackson wrote:I can never see the silly little pictures anyway as there seems to be some sort of content lock on them and completely agree these Q&A's seem completely pointless.
Silly little pictures? If you can't see them how come do you know they are silly. ?
Simple thing to do is if you can't see them is not to click on Shaun's topics especially if you have nothing nice to say.
And if Shaun wants to send question and answers and he's happy with that then it has got nothing to do with you.

Re: Rachel Wilde Q+A success

by Ashjackson » Mon Nov 03, 2014 11:38 am

I can never see the silly little pictures anyway as there seems to be some sort of content lock on them and completely agree these Q&A's seem completely pointless.

Top