luckyas13canbe wrote:

adzladz wrote:

luckyas13canbe wrote:And your evidence is where....? Hence asking to see it, pretty straightforward I would think. If you're going to make allegations of non authentic signatures, then evidence is needed.

Looking at it closer I guess it looks to be fine. Just when I looked at them the first time the "with" looked uncannily similar and the overall spacing of the signature looked close. I don't have a problem with people disagreeing with me but they way you did it was not nice and I think you should look at your post before you put others down. I have been collecting for 2 years and am just trying to help others out.

Humble apologies. That's the way I am really, I say it how it is. Joys of the internet is it can come across in many ways. A quick check before posting would have shown you it wasn't the case, simples really. [insert meerkat image here]

adzladz wrote:

luckyas13canbe wrote:And your evidence is where....? Hence asking to see it, pretty straightforward I would think. If you're going to make allegations of non authentic signatures, then evidence is needed.

Looking at it closer I guess it looks to be fine. Just when I looked at them the first time the "with" looked uncannily similar and the overall spacing of the signature looked close. I don't have a problem with people disagreeing with me but they way you did it was not nice and I think you should look at your post before you put others down. I have been collecting for 2 years and am just trying to help others out.

luckyas13canbe wrote:And your evidence is where....? Hence asking to see it, pretty straightforward I would think. If you're going to make allegations of non authentic signatures, then evidence is needed.

adzladz wrote:

luckyas13canbe wrote:

adzladz wrote:I just think it looks REALLY close to the other one posted very recently. the with looks almost identical so I am leaning towards auto pen but I don't want to jump to conclusions. It just looks so similar with slight variations that an auto pen machine might generate. I am not an expert but this is just my opinion! Congrats on your success either way!
Adam

Please do elaborate on the "slight variations", I'd be delighted to see your research into this. Pretty **** AP machine if it changes the width of loops in both the initial "r" and the closing "e", not to mention completely removing the space in the "e" on the "with love" inscription.

Sometimes I fall about laughing when I read some of the posts on here. Such a complete lack of knowledge or (when it's a newbie who doesn't know better but thinks they do) a complete lack of common sense before making brash comments.

I was just saying my opinion.

luckyas13canbe wrote:

adzladz wrote:I just think it looks REALLY close to the other one posted very recently. the with looks almost identical so I am leaning towards auto pen but I don't want to jump to conclusions. It just looks so similar with slight variations that an auto pen machine might generate. I am not an expert but this is just my opinion! Congrats on your success either way!
Adam

Please do elaborate on the "slight variations", I'd be delighted to see your research into this. Pretty **** AP machine if it changes the width of loops in both the initial "r" and the closing "e", not to mention completely removing the space in the "e" on the "with love" inscription.

Sometimes I fall about laughing when I read some of the posts on here. Such a complete lack of knowledge or (when it's a newbie who doesn't know better but thinks they do) a complete lack of common sense before making brash comments.

adzladz wrote:I just think it looks REALLY close to the other one posted very recently. the with looks almost identical so I am leaning towards auto pen but I don't want to jump to conclusions. It just looks so similar with slight variations that an auto pen machine might generate. I am not an expert but this is just my opinion! Congrats on your success either way!
Adam

adzladz wrote:do you want opinions on authenticity?