by ElfMaidenArcher » Tue Jun 18, 2013 7:30 pm
luckyas13canbe wrote:ElfMaidenArcher wrote:luckyas13canbe wrote:They are SO obviously different it's not true.
You might want to check your grammar... Or did you seriously think they are secretarials???!!! Richard NEVER EVER does secretarials. And when people sign their name, there will always be a slight difference between on signature and another... My handwriting/neatness changes all the time, it's annoying.
Congrats OP! Those are pre-signed...not pre-prints... Obviously, pre-prints would look EXACTLY alike and look as if nobody actually used a real Sharpie.
He's only doing this because he's busy filming until August.
Wait? You mean that genuine signatures are NEVER identical? How can this be? My entire understanding of this has turned on it's axis? Wait... does this mean that Planet of the Apes really DID happen and Bill Clinton did not have relations with Monica Lewinsky? I mean, if signatures are never identical, then anything could be true.
Oh wait....
Grammar not top of my list when I have had less than three hours sleep in two days. As you well know, it clearly states the signatures are different, and as such cannot be preprints. At no point there did I claim that them being different was a negative fact in terms of authenticity. For the record, I have had more of my items returned signed by Richard in the last couple of years than the majority of this forum combined, so no, under no circumstances did I suggest this was anything but genuine.
Sorry, man. I believe I misunderstood your previous post or it did not convey very clearly. What I thought you meant by "They are SO obviously different it's not true" was "They are so obviously different it's not a real/authentic autograph".
And I think you didn't read my post properly. I never said that signatures are NEVER identical. I wrote "there will always be a slight difference between a signature and another" (hint word: slight) meaning not all strokes will be the same/consistent aka the signature will not be extremely the same considering stroke, dots etc. depending how fast the person is signing. If it was all alike it would be a PP.
No hard feelings...and I understand...lack of sleep and all. Cheers.
P.S. I am not an adult, yet, so it's understandable that teenagers'/children's handwriting slightly improves/changes over the years. Yeah, I know has nothing to do with Richard, but is to clarify what I wrote in my previous post.
[quote="luckyas13canbe"][quote="ElfMaidenArcher"][quote="luckyas13canbe"]They are SO obviously different it's not true.[/quote]
You might want to check your grammar... Or did you seriously think they are secretarials???!!! Richard NEVER EVER does secretarials. And when people sign their name, there will always be a slight difference between on signature and another... My handwriting/neatness changes all the time, it's annoying.
Congrats OP! Those are pre-signed...not pre-prints... Obviously, pre-prints would look EXACTLY alike and look as if nobody actually used a real Sharpie.
He's only doing this because he's busy filming until August.[/quote]
Wait? You mean that genuine signatures are NEVER identical? How can this be? My entire understanding of this has turned on it's axis? Wait... does this mean that Planet of the Apes really DID happen and Bill Clinton did not have relations with Monica Lewinsky? I mean, if signatures are never identical, then anything could be true.
Oh wait....
Grammar not top of my list when I have had less than three hours sleep in two days. As you well know, it clearly states the signatures are different, and as such cannot be preprints. At no point there did I claim that them being different was a negative fact in terms of authenticity. For the record, I have had more of my items returned signed by Richard in the last couple of years than the majority of this forum combined, so no, under no circumstances did I suggest this was anything but genuine.[/quote]
Sorry, man. I believe I misunderstood your previous post or it did not convey very clearly. What I thought you meant by "They are SO obviously different it's not true" was "They are so obviously different it's not a real/authentic autograph".
And I think you didn't read my post properly. I never said that signatures are NEVER identical. I wrote "there will always be a slight difference between a signature and another" (hint word: slight) meaning not all strokes will be the same/consistent aka the signature will not be extremely the same considering stroke, dots etc. depending how fast the person is signing. If it was all alike it would be a PP.
No hard feelings...and I understand...lack of sleep and all. Cheers.
P.S. I am not an adult, yet, so it's understandable that teenagers'/children's handwriting slightly improves/changes over the years. Yeah, I know has nothing to do with Richard, but is to clarify what I wrote in my previous post.
Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur