by HappinessStan » Fri Oct 21, 2011 11:41 am
Congratulations! (no pun intended)
It seems a bit odd that he should go from not signing anything for a long time to sending out again. Also, even though the sig looks pretty close to examples I've seen, it does look a lot smaller than it used to be.
It's only a gut feeling, and I hope that I'm wrong, but I'm slightly suspicious about these and the one which was posted the other day. Please don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to be all negative, or kick off another John Travolta style four-page argument, but wonder if anyone else has any thoughts either way on Sir Cliff's authenticity?
Congratulations! (no pun intended)
It seems a bit odd that he should go from not signing anything for a long time to sending out again. Also, even though the sig looks pretty close to examples I've seen, it does look a lot smaller than it used to be.
It's only a gut feeling, and I hope that I'm wrong, but I'm slightly suspicious about these and the one which was posted the other day. Please don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to be all negative, or kick off another John Travolta style four-page argument, but wonder if anyone else has any thoughts either way on Sir Cliff's authenticity?