George W. Bush Success

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: George W. Bush Success

Re: George W. Bush Success

by stillluckyas13canbe » Sun Jan 26, 2014 3:10 pm

CHIgrapher wrote:
stillluckyas13canbe wrote:
WillyWonka11 wrote: My biggest concern is a situation like this... A person posts a "success" that is an obvious autopen. All the responses are "Congrats!" and "Great Job!" A person new to autograph collecting gets on here, sees the responses, and thinks they can send to that address and get a real autograph. They waste their time and money to get a printed autograph.
Exactly why I believe it is important that people do point out it's non authentic.


If only all the members here shared the same beliefs.... this community would be a better place and a more reliable source for information. Until then... it continues to be basically a joke amongst the collecting hobby.
I'm with you on that one mate. I am as guilty as the next man of being sarcastic etc in my posting, but the amount on here who stoop to being abusive, or who seem to have no concept of basic premises like how to post in the right place, or commenting on non authentics. One day...

Re: George W. Bush Success

by CHIgrapher » Sun Jan 26, 2014 2:43 pm

stillluckyas13canbe wrote:
WillyWonka11 wrote: My biggest concern is a situation like this... A person posts a "success" that is an obvious autopen. All the responses are "Congrats!" and "Great Job!" A person new to autograph collecting gets on here, sees the responses, and thinks they can send to that address and get a real autograph. They waste their time and money to get a printed autograph.
Exactly why I believe it is important that people do point out it's non authentic.


If only all the members here shared the same beliefs.... this community would be a better place and a more reliable source for information. Until then... it continues to be basically a joke amongst the collecting hobby.

Re: George W. Bush Success

by stillluckyas13canbe » Sun Jan 26, 2014 11:31 am

WillyWonka11 wrote: My biggest concern is a situation like this... A person posts a "success" that is an obvious autopen. All the responses are "Congrats!" and "Great Job!" A person new to autograph collecting gets on here, sees the responses, and thinks they can send to that address and get a real autograph. They waste their time and money to get a printed autograph.
Exactly why I believe it is important that people do point out it's non authentic.

Re: George W. Bush Success

by WillyWonka11 » Sun Jan 26, 2014 3:54 am

I definitely would not condone rude or mean-spirited comments. However, aren't we all here to get "authentic, hand-written signatures?" Pointing out that something is pre-printed, autopen or secretarial is helping weed-out the garbage, and helping identify real autographs. My biggest concern is a situation like this... A person posts a "success" that is an obvious autopen. All the responses are "Congrats!" and "Great Job!" A person new to autograph collecting gets on here, sees the responses, and thinks they can send to that address and get a real autograph. They waste their time and money to get a printed autograph.

I guess it bugs me because I've been there before. It helps to see honest opinions of others to help determine the chances of getting a real autograph from a particular address.

Re: George W. Bush Success

by CHIgrapher » Sun Jan 26, 2014 2:18 am

Lol

I will never congratulate anyone on getting fake autographs. Whether they ask for my opinion or not.

If you dont like me and the other members doing that.... maybe you need a new hobby.

If more members on here would be open to constructive criticism and be willing to learn more about this hobby... we wouldn't see the same fake autograph successes posted on a daily basis.

Re: George W. Bush Success

by DiamondDave » Sat Jan 25, 2014 11:58 pm

CHIgrapher wrote:

This sounds like cyber bullying to me.... calling me a troll for commenting on the autographs authenticity.

Your post as been reported to the proper authorities.
Go for it.
You're really showing your true colors at this point.
I'm simply defending posters from trolls. Apparently, you want to defend said trolls.
Perhaps you're part of the problem as well?

Be kind to one another. It's pretty simple.

Instead, trolls on this forum trip over one another to declare something less than authentic....and enjoy doing so.
All for what? They claim all kinds of reasons...claim all kinds of expert status......basically, you look silly and are a troll.
If someone asks for opinions on authenticity, by all means go right ahead. If they don't, mind your manners and say nothing less than congrats.
Too many people here hide behind a keyboard and say things via this forum that they would never say to someone's face.

They see me rollin'....they hatin".

Re: George W. Bush Success

by wongcastle » Sat Jan 25, 2014 8:58 pm

Yes, posting on a public forum does implicitly invite comments. Realistically, that's probably not the only issue.

Posting on a public forum also invites comments on grammar, punctuation, and spelling as well, although that would mean most finger-pointers (self included, occasionally) would be pointing back at themselves. Fortunately, we tend to overlook those deficiencies for the most part.

The bigger question is whether or not there can be a civil exchange of information by all concerned, be they total novices who are unaware of pre-prints or seasoned collectors who presume to know all of the ins and outs of the hobby. Truth be told, we all have something to gain, and some even have a little to give.

If I have ever been guilty of what would be considered uncharitable comments, I would like to apologize for them at this time. Perhaps some of the rest of you might want to consider doing the same.

Re: George W. Bush Success

by CHIgrapher » Sat Jan 25, 2014 3:22 pm

DiamondDave wrote:
stillluckyas13canbe wrote:
CHIgrapher wrote:Looks like the usual auto pen signature unfortunately.
Watch out, you're not allowed to burst people's bubble on this site any more.
Quite the comedian huh?

Or you just disappointed that they got to be a troll before you?

This sounds like cyber bullying to me.... calling me a troll for commenting on the autographs authenticity.

Your post as been reported to the proper authorities.

Re: George W. Bush Success

by Zaj » Sat Jan 25, 2014 3:13 pm

WillyWonka11 wrote:Posting on a public feedback forum is equal to requesting an opinion.
+1 EXACTLY

Re: George W. Bush Success

by WillyWonka11 » Sat Jan 25, 2014 2:58 pm

Posting on a public feedback forum is equal to requesting an opinion.

Top