Julie Andrews success
Forum rules
Sponsored link: Try Amazon Prime 30-Day Free Trial - Watch Thousands of Movies & TV Shows Anytime
Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur
Search the message board
Sponsored link: Try Amazon Prime 30-Day Free Trial - Watch Thousands of Movies & TV Shows Anytime
Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur
Search the message board
Re: Julie Andrews success
Hi shaun
Thank you for your feedback Great Success
You have been added to the list for the $10 gift certificate.
Julie Andrews on Fanmail.biz | Previous Feedback(s) Received
Fanmail
Thank you for your feedback Great Success
You have been added to the list for the $10 gift certificate.
Julie Andrews on Fanmail.biz | Previous Feedback(s) Received
Fanmail
Via Venue Addresses (Until September 2024) updated 3/9/2024
Re: Julie Andrews success
Dang. That sucks. However, that's is a very nice letter that they enclosed with it. At least you got an explanation!
-
- Autograph Collector
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2011 10:58 am
- Contact:
Re: Julie Andrews success
I have had 2 pre-printed photos sent from that address & one originally signed bookplate.shaun wrote:I sent a letter and SAE to Julie on: 17th December 2012, and today I recieved this unsigned photo back, plus a note from Julie's PA saying ' she can't sign'. its sad but understandable though.
address I used was:
Julie Andrews,
PO Box 491668,
Los Angeles
CA 90049-8668
USA
Julie does, however, signed via venue. She signed 3 photos for me (even though I only asked for one - the others were for Nicholas Hammond to sign & they both signed them).
She is a good signer ... under the right circumstances
-
- Autograph Collector
- Posts: 567
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 1:16 pm
Re: Julie Andrews success
This is not a success.
-
- Autograph Collector
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2011 10:58 am
- Contact:
Re: Julie Andrews success
Thanks for your reply luckyas13canbe ...luckyas13canbe wrote:This is not a success.
Just to clarify ... which bit wasn't a success? The bookplate that was provided by Dame Julie (or her publicist) & certainly signed by Dame Julie so that it could be stuck into my book (it costs a lot to mail a book to the US from overseas, you know). So that's a success in anyone's terms I'd think. Particularly when I wanted a bookplate for the book.
The two pre-printed photos are more successful than getting nothing back or getting an unsigned photo that others have reported. Heck, there's a whole section on this site for people who write to StudioFanMail to happily report "successful" pre-prints.
& via venues are certainly successes ... although clearly not at the reported address ... & my point was that if someone desperately wants a signed photo of Dame Julie, perhaps via venue might be a good option.
But if none of that helps in YOUR opinion then ignore my post.
-
- Autograph Collector
- Posts: 567
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 1:16 pm
Re: Julie Andrews success
A random photo which is unsigned is not a success, sent out by a pleb and nothing to do with the celebrity who has been written to. I at no point commented on anything you posted, though I also believe PPs are pointless. As for SFM etc... talk about a waste of time, and I have no idea why that sort of thing excites anyone.goswannies wrote:Thanks for your reply luckyas13canbe ...luckyas13canbe wrote:This is not a success.
Just to clarify ... which bit wasn't a success? The bookplate that was provided by Dame Julie (or her publicist) & certainly signed by Dame Julie so that it could be stuck into my book (it costs a lot to mail a book to the US from overseas, you know). So that's a success in anyone's terms I'd think. Particularly when I wanted a bookplate for the book.
The two pre-printed photos are more successful than getting nothing back or getting an unsigned photo that others have reported. Heck, there's a whole section on this site for people who write to StudioFanMail to happily report "successful" pre-prints.
& via venues are certainly successes ... although clearly not at the reported address ... & my point was that if someone desperately wants a signed photo of Dame Julie, perhaps via venue might be a good option.
But if none of that helps in YOUR opinion then ignore my post.
-
- Autograph Collector
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2011 10:58 am
- Contact:
Re: Julie Andrews success
Ah my apologies ... you were responding to the original "success" post? My mistake.luckyas13canbe wrote:A random photo which is unsigned is not a success, sent out by a pleb and nothing to do with the celebrity who has been written to. I at no point commented on anything you posted, though I also believe PPs are pointless. As for SFM etc... talk about a waste of time, and I have no idea why that sort of thing excites anyone.
One use of PPs or SFM is that they might be able to be used to varify a success ... though I guess they could be used by forgers too. Worse still, when they appear on eBay & are passed off as originals. IMO SFM should stamp or print StudioFanMail on the back or front of the picture so that it's clear that it's not an original.
-
- Autograph Collector
- Posts: 567
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 1:16 pm
Re: Julie Andrews success
100% agree, too many people who are inexperienced can be fooledgoswannies wrote:Ah my apologies ... you were responding to the original "success" post? My mistake.luckyas13canbe wrote:A random photo which is unsigned is not a success, sent out by a pleb and nothing to do with the celebrity who has been written to. I at no point commented on anything you posted, though I also believe PPs are pointless. As for SFM etc... talk about a waste of time, and I have no idea why that sort of thing excites anyone.
One use of PPs or SFM is that they might be able to be used to varify a success ... though I guess they could be used by forgers too. Worse still, when they appear on eBay & are passed off as originals. IMO SFM should stamp or print StudioFanMail on the back or front of the picture so that it's clear that it's not an original.
Re: Julie Andrews success
I think the forum should just be grateful that Julie Andrews is sending out formal letters to address her reason for not signing instead of having her secretaries sign for her!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests