Page 10 of 13

Re: Celebrities Believed to Send Secretarial Autographs 2011

Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2014 6:17 pm
by Craig911
i also think dakota fanning has one of her siblings or one of her parents sign for her

Re: Celebrities Believed to Send Secretarial Autographs 2011

Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2014 5:49 am
by vivalakayla
Craig911 wrote:i also think dakota fanning has one of her siblings or one of her parents sign for her
No, hers are definitely authentic. They match her IP just a rushed version and she's been signing TTM for years!

Re: Celebrities Believed to Send Secretarial Autographs 2011

Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2014 6:09 pm
by Craig911
vivalakayla wrote:
Craig911 wrote:i also think dakota fanning has one of her siblings or one of her parents sign for her
No, hers are definitely authentic. They match her IP just a rushed version and she's been signing TTM for years!
why do people get their stuff back signed from a california address when she's going to school and living in new york?

Re: Celebrities Believed to Send Secretarial Autographs 2011

Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2014 6:25 pm
by vivalakayla
Craig911 wrote:
why do people get their stuff back signed from a california address when she's going to school and living in new york?
Good question, I don't keep tabs on her. But unless her sister got insanely good almost mirroring her signature it's definitely Dakota. Her TTM and IP match. If you can give me some more proof as to why you think they are not signed by her, LMK.

Re: Celebrities Believed to Send Secretarial Autographs 2011

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 4:31 pm
by gghi18
Craig911 wrote:I'm on the fence about Paris Hilton too. What about Zach Galifianakis?
I'm not certain on Zach's but I'm leaning toward sec (at least the more recent ones). :(

Re: Celebrities Believed to Send Secretarial Autographs 2011

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 5:27 pm
by vivalakayla
gghi18 wrote:
I'm not certain on Zach's but I'm leaning toward sec (at least the more recent ones). :(
I think they may be sec too. I dont know just a weird vibe I get. But then again he seems to take awhile to send back. At least that's how it used to be. There would be spurts where no one heard from them then some successes etc etc. If he had a sec wouldn't it be a bigger chance that replies would be much more quick?

Re: Celebrities Believed to Send Secretarial Autographs 2011

Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 5:47 pm
by Craig911
add paul anka

Re: Celebrities Believed to Send Secretarial Autographs 2011

Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 5:48 pm
by Craig911
vivalakayla wrote:
gghi18 wrote:
I'm not certain on Zach's but I'm leaning toward sec (at least the more recent ones). :(
I think they may be sec too. I dont know just a weird vibe I get. But then again he seems to take awhile to send back. At least that's how it used to be. There would be spurts where no one heard from them then some successes etc etc. If he had a sec wouldn't it be a bigger chance that replies would be much more quick?
not really, channing tatum's and doris day's ghost signers take months to respond

Re: Celebrities Believed to Send Secretarial Autographs 2011

Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 5:42 pm
by Craig911
any opinions on brooke shields? in person she only writes brooke but the recent ttm returns she signs her full name. i think that's kind of odd

Re: Celebrities Believed to Send Secretarial Autographs 2011

Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2014 8:55 pm
by gghi18
Craig911 wrote:any opinions on brooke shields? in person she only writes brooke but the recent ttm returns she signs her full name. i think that's kind of odd
Personally, I think Brooke Shield's TTM/VV are authentic. I think some of her IP's are rushed so she tries to write her first name neat without her last name because it's quicker. Maybe?? Here are some examples:

http://www.autographworld.com/sigs/show2.asp?item=962

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Brooke-Shields- ... 5d49958597

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Brooke-Shields- ... 4ad1089edc