I stand corrected, maybe he does sign with God Bless but its still different from ttm to in person.Alfie1997 wrote:DiamondDave wrote:And I'm pretty sure nobody gives a **** about your opinion.Alfie1997 wrote:I think it's secretarial
I don't really care what you think. I know it's a sec as I have recieved them in the past. And have got his book signed from him in person. Both completely different styles of writing. It's common knowledge he doesn't sign TTM but you can think what you want.
----
This is his real sig that matches my IP
http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic.php?t=368694
Dick Van Dyke personalized success
Forum rules
Sponsored link: Try Amazon Prime 30-Day Free Trial - Watch Thousands of Movies & TV Shows Anytime
Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur
Search the message board
Sponsored link: Try Amazon Prime 30-Day Free Trial - Watch Thousands of Movies & TV Shows Anytime
Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur
Search the message board
-
- Autograph Collector
- Posts: 854
- Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2014 9:19 pm
- Contact:
Re: Dick Van Dyke personalized success
Re: Dick Van Dyke personalized success
An obvious secretarial signature. Too bad.
-
- Autograph Collector
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2014 7:12 pm
Re: Dick Van Dyke personalized success
fromuk2014 wrote:in all fairness whilst he didn't give a reason or explain his critique I think he's right even if the method was just to be a bigot or troll.
.
Well you didn't give a reason or explain this what you posted.
http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic ... 0#p1364980
So that makes you a bigot or a troll too. Is this correct?
-
- Autograph Collector
- Posts: 854
- Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2014 9:19 pm
- Contact:
Re: Dick Van Dyke personalized success
I don't see how you will take the comment here against me not explaining why lie detectors are not full proof, its not like I was about to write an essay on the factual premise of why lie detectors are not fully accurate.
Here in this thread the response was blunt, abrupt - I'm not saying that's a bad thing but something helpful would have been useful, the only reason I saw this thread was because I was researching Dick Van Dykes autograph in hope of finding useful information towards secretarial vs. in person.
Why you took the time to dig up a post is beyond me, the two comments do not parallel at all.
What's even more curious is that I responded to the user you're frequently bickering with, but you bring my comment which was in response to them like you're defending the comment they made, either way I don't see how I needed to explain why a lie detector is not proof when this is more common knowledge than how a specific celebrity signs.
Here in this thread the response was blunt, abrupt - I'm not saying that's a bad thing but something helpful would have been useful, the only reason I saw this thread was because I was researching Dick Van Dykes autograph in hope of finding useful information towards secretarial vs. in person.
Why you took the time to dig up a post is beyond me, the two comments do not parallel at all.
What's even more curious is that I responded to the user you're frequently bickering with, but you bring my comment which was in response to them like you're defending the comment they made, either way I don't see how I needed to explain why a lie detector is not proof when this is more common knowledge than how a specific celebrity signs.
-
- Autograph Collector
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2014 7:12 pm
Re: Dick Van Dyke personalized success
I don't know what your talking about. I can't ever remember talking or bickering with that user. Can you show me where or when. ?
All the guy said was I think it's secretarial and you said he was a troll.
He didn't need to explain as its common knowledge on here. There have been more dick van dyke secretarial posts on here than i have had hot dinners so the guy did nothing wrong yet you were calling him names for no reason that's all I'm saying.
All the guy said was I think it's secretarial and you said he was a troll.
He didn't need to explain as its common knowledge on here. There have been more dick van dyke secretarial posts on here than i have had hot dinners so the guy did nothing wrong yet you were calling him names for no reason that's all I'm saying.
-
- Autograph Collector
- Posts: 854
- Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2014 9:19 pm
- Contact:
Re: Dick Van Dyke personalized success
You've misread what I wrote or taken it the wrong way, I can't work out which.Imortalmindz wrote:I don't know what your talking about. I can't ever remember talking or bickering with that user. Can you show me where or when. ?
All the guy said was I think it's secretarial and you said he was a troll.
He didn't need to explain as its common knowledge on here. There have been more dick van dyke secretarial posts on here than i have had hot dinners so the guy did nothing wrong yet you were calling him names for no reason that's all I'm saying.
My response in the thread you posted was to dancingirl and not even in an abrupt manner, this is who you bicker with, there's a mass long thread in the general section between the two of you.
Read again, I said even if his comment was intended that way, I never said it was, I said if it was.
-
- Autograph Collector
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2014 7:12 pm
Re: Dick Van Dyke personalized success
Ok I think I got confused I don't know.. That dancinguy tries to winde me up so I just started doing the same to him that's why the long thread I got the better of him in the end and people came to my defence. It went on for nearly 6 weeks. Lol.
Anyway this dick van dyke autograph is a sec but members here can believe what they want if they don't wanna believe it.
Anyway this dick van dyke autograph is a sec but members here can believe what they want if they don't wanna believe it.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests