Fanmail.biz

Sarah Jessica Parker
send: march 16th 2009 (while they were filming in NY)
received: today my 2 pics backs with her secretary's neat and beautiful autograph
address: no longer valid
"Did you hear about the Morgans"
WHYoming Production Inc
599, Broadway
USA- NY NY 10012
I won't waste time to post the pics, it's the same secretarial signature you get through her agency

The interesting thing is yesterday I saw an autograph she gave in person to a journalist from my country who interviewd her for a tv show and the autograph is very similar to the ones ttm. A bit more rushed but very similar.
I think maybe in person (I'm talking about many ppl asking her autograph) she may just do the usual crazy line autograph that many celebrities do to avoid the items from being sold but in the process those are the ones that are labeled "authentics".
Who knows...

i'm sorry about your sec i think it was wirth to try it

Sorry about that.I hear she is normally very nice.

theartist29 wrote:The interesting thing is yesterday I saw an autograph she gave in person to a journalist from my country who interviewd her for a tv show and the autograph is very similar to the ones ttm. A bit more rushed but very similar.
I think maybe in person (I'm talking about many ppl asking her autograph) she may just do the usual crazy line autograph that many celebrities do to avoid the items from being sold but in the process those are the ones that are labeled "authentics".
Who knows...

This is a very interesting point, and one that is not often discussed!Not only in relation to Jessica, but to any celeb. Maybe ip's at thing like premiers are slightly less reliable, as they are either rushed are done deliberately poorly to prevent selling!

Jaffer wrote:

theartist29 wrote:The interesting thing is yesterday I saw an autograph she gave in person to a journalist from my country who interviewd her for a tv show and the autograph is very similar to the ones ttm. A bit more rushed but very similar.
I think maybe in person (I'm talking about many ppl asking her autograph) she may just do the usual crazy line autograph that many celebrities do to avoid the items from being sold but in the process those are the ones that are labeled "authentics".
Who knows...

This is a very interesting point, and one that is not often discussed!Not only in relation to Jessica, but to any celeb. Maybe ip's at thing like premiers are slightly less reliable, as they are either rushed are done deliberately poorly to prevent selling!

SJP has signed authentically TTM before, and her authentic TTM's match her IP's perfectly, unlike her usual secretarials. If you search the board, I believe one was posted a few months ago.

Hi dani,

May I ask where your request was mailed back from?

I sent a request to that same venue in NY, and just this last Wednesday I received my request mailed back to me from Montreal.

I am busy wondering: If it was signed by her secretary, then how on Earth was it mailed to me from Montreal?

Both SJP's PO box, and agency, are located in California. Does your request have a CA stamp on it?

Just curious.

Well, I don't really know where it was mailed back from
The stamps were'nt cancelled and the was a slim white strip glued on the enveloppe with a bar-code. You see this sometimes on mail from US.

nightowl wrote:Hi dani,

May I ask where your request was mailed back from?

I sent a request to that same venue in NY, and just this last Wednesday I received my request mailed back to me from Montreal.

I am busy wondering: If it was signed by her secretary, then how on Earth was it mailed to me from Montreal?

Both SJP's PO box, and agency, are located in California. Does your request have a CA stamp on it?

Just curious.

That happens to me to, quite a bit. The stamps aren't cancelled and therefore there is no way of knowing where a venue request was mailed back from.

If it is a question of trying to determine authenticity, based on it's origin---hopefully the state where they are filming, and not the state where their agency is---then a cancellation stamp becomes very important.

I have looked at the MANY secs and mine, at a glance, looks similar. But there are odd descrepancies that I have not seen in any of the secs. This leaves me to wonder if it is real. The fact that it was mailed back to me from Montreal is a major factor in that assessment.

Hmmm . . . ?