Page 1 of 2
Hugh Jackman success
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:31 pm
by davseb66
Envoyé le 30 octobre 2012
Reçu le 20 janvier 2013
J'ai envoyé deux photos + 1 lettre – j’ai reçu une de mes photos signées l’autre non
Adresse utilisé :
Hugh Jackman
Lou Coulson Associates Ltd.
1st Floor
37 Berwick Street
London W1F 8RS
UK
Mais sur l’enveloppe celle ci a été envoyé des USA à cette adresse :
3727 W. Magnolia
Burbank, CA 91505
USA
Uploaded with
ImageShack.us
Re: Hugh Jackman success
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:43 pm
by poppincurbs
C'etait magnifique
Re: Hugh Jackman success
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:46 pm
by georgethree33
Sorry - but anything from this address:
3727 W. Magnolia
Burbank, CA 91505
Is either autopen or a preprint. Don't have mine to compare to right now, but it looks like the autopen I got from Hugh too. Hugh is terrible about signing TTM. Sad but true.
Re: Hugh Jackman success
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 6:24 pm
by goldencardinal
Still amazing pic!
Re: Hugh Jackman success
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 6:45 pm
by davseb66
Concernant l'adresse, j'ai envoyé mes photos en Angleterre (address database) et ils ont du envoyé mes photos aux USA (address database).
j'ai reçu aujourd'hui mes deux photos que j'avais envoyé dont une qui était signée par lui même.
Re: Hugh Jackman success
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 6:46 pm
by skaboss241
goldencardinal wrote:Still amazing pic!
He said that he send two photos and letter and got back one signed.
Re: Hugh Jackman success
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 6:55 pm
by georgethree33
which is only further proof that it's autopen. Very typical to "sign" only one. Spanky Taylor does that with almost every request - if he used the machine to sign two - it would be a dead giveaway right from the start. The autograph is fake. compare it to the other jackman "successes" on this site - it'll match with machine perfection - it's an autopen.
Re: Hugh Jackman success
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 7:08 pm
by davseb66
It is up to you to believe if it is a forgery or the truth, for me it is the truth I compared with of other one on fanmail and on other site and it is the same writing.
The signature looks like the others, then why the machine?
Re: Hugh Jackman success
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 7:14 pm
by James
davseb66 wrote:The signature looks like the others, then why the machine?
It's the same as the others because it was done by a machine. Simples.
Re: Hugh Jackman success
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 7:54 pm
by georgethree33
Because it's not similar - it's the same. That's why. There's no variation with autopens.
