Fanmail.biz

Sent 5/19
LOR and photo
Received 6/23 ISP

Address used:
Clint Eastwood
Malpaso Productions
4000 Warner Blvd
Bldg.16
Burbank, CA 91522

Outstanding. That must've been some LOR. I'm very impressed.

i have never sent as I have seen the videos and posts that they are all secs and never pass PSA....you think maybe this one is real?

Hi ShiftyHenry

Thank you for your feedback Great Success

You have been added to the list for the $10 gift certificate.

Clint Eastwood on Fanmail.biz | Previous Feedback(s) Received

Fanmail

Sure. It looks real enough to me.

Personally, I don't believe most of the claims on this site that signitures are 'secretarial.' Without being obtained in person, I can't imagine how anyone would know that a signiture was or was not placed on a document by someone other than the person identified by the signiture. Nor can I imagine the circumstances under which it could occur.

Clint Eastwood is one of a handful of working actors who were originally employed by a major studio during the end of what's known as the star system. Signing autographs and replying to fan mail was just one component of the responsibilities the studios impressed on contract players. Eastwood has always seemed to me to be a genuinely decent individual, and my thought is that if Eastwood himself were not able to comply with an autograph request, it's much, much more likely that the secretarial responsibility would be to enclose a short explanation in the SASE that the required signiture could not be supplied as requested, along with a short detailing of the reasons, and possibly a pre-printed autograph on a recent handout photo. Except for the pre-printed autographed photo, that's precisely what's done with such celebrities as Paul McCartney--probably the most-desired authentic autograph in the world--Julie Andrews, and several others.

So, yeah, I believe the Eastwood signiture is authentic. And I'll continue to believe it until it's proven otherwise...preferably by someone who was there at the time, and can testify under oath that they saw Eastwood not sign the photo.

cschultz-2 wrote:Sure. It looks real enough to me.

Personally, I don't believe most of the claims on this site that signitures are 'secretarial.' Without being obtained in person, I can't imagine how anyone would know that a signiture was or was not placed on a document by someone other than the person identified by the signiture. Nor can I imagine the circumstances under which it could occur.

Clint Eastwood is one of a handful of working actors who were originally employed by a major studio during the end of what's known as the star system. Signing autographs and replying to fan mail was just one component of the responsibilities the studios impressed on contract players. Eastwood has always seemed to me to be a genuinely decent individual, and my thought is that if Eastwood himself were not able to comply with an autograph request, it's much, much more likely that the secretarial responsibility would be to enclose a short explanation in the SASE that the required signiture could not be supplied as requested, along with a short detailing of the reasons, and possibly a pre-printed autograph on a recent handout photo. Except for the pre-printed autographed photo, that's precisely what's done with such celebrities as Paul McCartney--probably the most-desired authentic autograph in the world--Julie Andrews, and several others.

So, yeah, I believe the Eastwood signiture is authentic. And I'll continue to believe it until it's proven otherwise...preferably by someone who was there at the time, and can testify under oath that they saw Eastwood not sign the photo.

lol

SEC

had in depth disccussions on here about clints signature,and yet [no one] who was harping on about his sig being sec could prove it to be a sec,,, the simple fact is that they have no idea wether its a sec or not,they just listen to other people,without doing any research on it

cschultz-2 wrote:Sure. It looks real enough to me.

"real enough" doesn't mean it is real.

On your picture he wrote "Clint" and "Eastwood" in two words. But the original signature is in almost all cases one word. Like "CEastwood".

He is very, very, very (!!!) hard to get. Even ip. I met him a few times and on some events he passed the crowd and did nothing. One time (I guess it was in London a few years ago) some fans asked him on a premiere for autographs. Clint pointed to a woman who was in his staff: "You want autographs? Ask her"...

Thats all. He's a non-signer ttm. Maybe you can get him one day ip. But be sure its very hard.

i got him in london too,he was signing for anyone