Fanmail.biz

Hi !

Today I got autograph from Christina Aguilera !!! I`m so very happy ! Christina is very great and talented singer.

I hope that this autograph is pre-signed but everything comments are welcome ! PLEASE comment about authenticity

Thank you FanMail !

Sent : 15 December 2012 (only LOR)
Received : 19 March 2012 (autographed photo)
Used Address :
Christina Aguilera
Azoffmusic Management
1100 Glendon Avenue
Suite 2000
Los Angeles, CA 90024
USA

Photo 1 : http://img577.imageshack.us/img577/3915 ... ileras.jpg
Envelope :

Awesome success! I've been a little leary on her TTM's. I don't think they're secreatial or pre-prints. Here's a IP from autographworld.com http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/9246 ... aawip1.jpg (I had to upload it into imageshak because I've reached my limit on posting scans on Fanmail.biz). So either authentic or auto-pen...It's hard to say because the recent ones with her and a microphone seem to be signed differently, implying pre-signed, but I could be wrong. There was debate the picture you scanned was auto penned but it's been back and forth...sorry, this isn't the most helpful info. Either way, I hope it's authentic. Congrats!!!

Hi Bartosz994

Thank you for your feedback Great Success

You have been added to the list for the $10 gift certificate.

Christina Aguilera on Fanmail.biz | Previous Feedback(s) Received

Fanmail

Congrats on the success! personally, i think its pre-signed

oh btw, you should change the year in the sent line in your post!

Bartosz994 wrote: Sent : 15 December 2012 (only LOR)

gghi18 wrote:Awesome success! I've been a little leary on her TTM's. I don't think they're secreatial or pre-prints. Here's a IP from autographworld.com http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/9246 ... aawip1.jpg (I had to upload it into imageshak because I've reached my limit on posting scans on Fanmail.biz). So either authentic or auto-pen...It's hard to say because the recent ones with her and a microphone seem to be signed differently, implying pre-signed, but I could be wrong. There was debate the picture you scanned was auto penned but it's been back and forth...sorry, this isn't the most helpful info. Either way, I hope it's authentic. Congrats!!!

Thanks for your opinion! It's very helpfull to me I know, for sure it's not PP and secretarial (I read that she don't sign photos, who people sent her). So, I don't know it's AP or pre-signed...
These others photo (like this : http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/8493/87258993.jpg ), which sent recently was pre-signed, because everything signature was different. But this photo, which I got ... I don't now what it is
HELP ME !!!

nichole wrote:Congrats on the success! personally, i think its pre-signed
oh btw, you should change the year in the sent line in your post!

Bartosz994 wrote: Sent : 15 December 2012 (only LOR)

Och, sorry You have right

The only reason why I Think this is an AP is because of the two black dots at the bottom of her hair and on the right side of the photo where the white part is..but IDK.

Another FM user made this to prove these specific photos were auto-penned. http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/22 ... 0.jpg/sr=1 So it makes me question the new ones coming out but they all look different so it's 50/50.

You probably have right. My success (and success on photo like mine) are problany auto-pens
But success on the others photo are probably pre-signed. It's my opinion, but I'm not sure

?wietny autograf ;) Wczoraj tak?e dosta?am swój, na tym samym zdj?ciu. My?l?, ?e te zdj?cia po prostu by?y wcze?niej podpisywane.

Great autograph ;) Yesterday I received mine, on the same photo. I think that these photos are just pre-signed.