I knew you was young person.JenPotterhead wrote:Im 16 :p Im very new to all this, I've only started requesting in June, and to get a sort or reply, was good enough for me :p

I knew you was young person.JenPotterhead wrote:Im 16 :p Im very new to all this, I've only started requesting in June, and to get a sort or reply, was good enough for me :p
I think this isn't very true. I collect only for my love of the movies the actors star in. I NEVER sell any of my collections and i have been collecting things since I was 5. Sentimental value IMO is more valuable than monetaryjoe316 wrote:Sure they do.Send&Signed wrote:People collect for fun.But 90% of the world would rather know if their collectable is real and actually worth something so they (a) Didn't waste their time doing it for no gain and (b) Know that it will be worth something if they ever decide to get out of the hobby and sell it like 60% of all collectors eventually do when their collection becomes so valuable they got to sell it.
Would suck collecting something for half your life only to find that they are worthless to everyone but you.
Send&Signed wrote:I understand. A success to me is receiving something back. But yea, your point is very valid
Sometimes sentimental value overrides the monetary value. Collections don't necessarily have to be worth something.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 8 guests