Page 1 of 2
Kiefer Sutherland In Person Success
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:16 am
by Chris102
Kiefer was at a local record store promoting a new artist represented by his record label. I waited 3 hours to get my magazine and photo signed!
He was really kind to me, but I heard he's not usually a nice person.
My signatures look different from the TTM successes from him. Maybe TTM Kiefer successes are secretarial?

:)
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 6:14 am
by loveryan
Great success!!
Congrats!!

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:34 am
by celebrityfan
Well done! Personally, I've never gotten round to watching 24, but I have seen Kiefer in 'Young Guns 2' and 'Phone Booth' - and I think he's amazing! Well done again!

Re: Kiefer Sutherland In Person Success
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 2:53 pm
by R.S.V.P
CDolan02 wrote:
My signatures look different from the TTM successes from him. Maybe TTM Kiefer successes are secretarial?

They (TTM successes) indeed are secretarial, but most people on here still like to believe that what they get back TTM is always 100% authentic.

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:17 pm
by elmomommyto2
Please be respectful of all members, no matter what their beliefs are about their autographs. Autograph collecting is a fun hobby and not all collectors need to know if their autographs aren't genuine. If anyone else is like me, I don't care if I get PPs, etc. etc. So please respect other members of this board by not mocking them.
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 4:20 pm
by Volante
But he is allowed to say he thinks they are secretarial, isn't he?
If you don't care whether they are authentic or not, I guess there's no problem if RSVP say like that...?
TTM and this one are indeed different... Maybe they are secretarial after all, now we at least have something to compare with! =)
You never know, maybe they all are authentic, maybe not! ;)
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 5:44 pm
by whosurdaddy
I agree with RSVP Sutherland's are without a doubt secretarial. It was studied and reported many many many years ago and is actually very old news.Here is the problem alot of veteran collectors, those who have been collecting 15 + years have seen these studies and reports unfortunately you rarely if ever see them appear in publications for todays collector.
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 5:53 pm
by elmomommyto2
I personally don't give two hoots if Sutherland's autographs are secretarials. However, I won't have other members put down for their beliefs are
their autographs, as I clearly stated.
[/quote]They (TTM successes) indeed are secretarial,
but most people on here still like to believe that what they get back TTM is always 100% authentic.
[/quote]
This is the part of R.S.V.P's comment that I was concerned is showing lack of respect for other members of this board. Generalizing about the members of this board is uncalled for, very disrespectful and in this case, very untruthful. More experienced collectors are very knowledgable that not all autographs that come through the mail are genuine. So I'm simply asking for everyone to respect all other members and their rights to their own opinions.
Congratulations CDolan02 on getting a very impressive autograph

!
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 6:03 pm
by Volante
More experienced collectors are very knowledgable that not all autographs that come through the mail are genuine. So I'm simply asking for everyone to respect all other members and their rights to their own opinions.
I totally agree with that!
Btw, it doesn't feel it was too long ago your signature counter showed "2 weeks along"! ;)
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 6:09 pm
by elmomommyto2
Btw, it doesn't feel it was too long ago your signature counter showed "2 weeks along"! ;)

Actually I started it at 3 weeks I think. I found out on my husband's and my 9th anniversary of dating

. The whole process of 9 months takes way too long for me though

. On the upside, at least I only have another 15 weeks at most

!!!