TWILIGHT MOVIE NEWS (GOOD AND BAD NEWS)!! COMMENT!

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: TWILIGHT MOVIE NEWS (GOOD AND BAD NEWS)!! COMMENT!

Re: TWILIGHT MOVIE NEWS (GOOD AND BAD NEWS)!! COMMENT!

by musicfan » Thu May 20, 2010 3:58 am

Jaffer wrote:
musicfan wrote:

Chrissy
well them needing to chill out is my opinion...so {up} they need to understand that they are not Taylor, Kristen And Robert...
Yes, but what you need to understand is that nowhere in your original post did it say "they want the same payment as the big three". It simply said they wanted a pay rise.I m sure they are understand they are not the main stars, but that does not mean they are not entitled to a pay rise. For all we know, they could be asking for a fraction of the stars payment...
irish_angel wrote:According to Hollywood Insider Kellan and Ashley have now signed their deals for Breaking Dawn

Excellent. Athough, I followed a link on the site, and it says Megan Fox will not be in Transformers 3! Given how rubbish T2 was, there is no way I am watching it now lol! :lol:
http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2010/05/ ... king-dawn/
[/quote]

:mrgreen: but there are millions of people that can take their places and you know what it will still have amazing ratings...people think that those two minor characters will make a difference if they get replaced and really: i dont think it will...but they got what they wanted so good 4 them {up}

Re: TWILIGHT MOVIE NEWS (GOOD AND BAD NEWS)!! COMMENT!

by Jaffer » Thu May 20, 2010 3:43 am

musicfan wrote:

Chrissy
well them needing to chill out is my opinion...so {up} they need to understand that they are not Taylor, Kristen And Robert... [/quote]

Yes, but what you need to understand is that nowhere in your original post did it say "they want the same payment as the big three". It simply said they wanted a pay rise.I m sure they are understand they are not the main stars, but that does not mean they are not entitled to a pay rise. For all we know, they could be asking for a fraction of the stars payment...
irish_angel wrote:According to Hollywood Insider Kellan and Ashley have now signed their deals for Breaking Dawn

Excellent. Athough, I followed a link on the site, and it says Megan Fox will not be in Transformers 3! Given how rubbish T2 was, there is no way I am watching it now lol! :lol:
http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2010/05/ ... king-dawn/

Re: TWILIGHT MOVIE NEWS (GOOD AND BAD NEWS)!! COMMENT!

by musicfan » Wed May 19, 2010 10:14 pm

irish_angel wrote:According to Hollywood Insider Kellan and Ashley have now signed their deals for Breaking Dawn

http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2010/05/ ... king-dawn/
hmmmmmmmmm...

Re: TWILIGHT MOVIE NEWS (GOOD AND BAD NEWS)!! COMMENT!

by musicfan » Tue May 18, 2010 10:30 pm

Chrissy wrote:Lutz and Greene don't need to chill out, if only you knew how BAD Summit is to they're actors. They are cheated of they're money. So much of it is for them and the actors are ripped off. No they will never make as much as Kristen and Rob but they are making far less than they deserve when Ashley and Kellan are doing more stunts and dangerous work than other actors.I think it's important for the actors to stand up to these companies. Especially Summit, who takes in more from them in conventions and so on than anything else. It's all a way for Summit to get more money and if none of the actors that work for them speak up it will continue. It's a shame that companies like these get away with things.

On the topic of two movies being made. I really don't see the point. All they want, is again more and more money to come in, double the intake which they know they will get with the HUGE fanbase that will support 2 movies being made or three out of one book, so to say. It's a low scheme and i don't agree with it. It could be done in a 3 hour movie, i know many people would sit down to see the cast on the screen for three hours.


Chrissy
well them needing to chill out is my opinion...so {up} they need to understand that they are not Taylor, Kristen And Robert... :D thats just what i think...thanks for your opinion.

Re: TWILIGHT MOVIE NEWS (GOOD AND BAD NEWS)!! COMMENT!

by Chrissy » Tue May 18, 2010 10:01 pm

Lutz and Greene don't need to chill out, if only you knew how BAD Summit is to they're actors. They are cheated of they're money. So much of it is for them and the actors are ripped off. No they will never make as much as Kristen and Rob but they are making far less than they deserve when Ashley and Kellan are doing more stunts and dangerous work than other actors.I think it's important for the actors to stand up to these companies. Especially Summit, who takes in more from them in conventions and so on than anything else. It's all a way for Summit to get more money and if none of the actors that work for them speak up it will continue. It's a shame that companies like these get away with things.

On the topic of two movies being made. I really don't see the point. All they want, is again more and more money to come in, double the intake which they know they will get with the HUGE fanbase that will support 2 movies being made or three out of one book, so to say. It's a low scheme and i don't agree with it. It could be done in a 3 hour movie, i know many people would sit down to see the cast on the screen for three hours.


Chrissy

Re: TWILIGHT MOVIE NEWS (GOOD AND BAD NEWS)!! COMMENT!

by dragon_star » Mon May 17, 2010 3:32 pm

The Lord of the Rings films were about 3 hours each and they were still shown that long

Re: TWILIGHT MOVIE NEWS (GOOD AND BAD NEWS)!! COMMENT!

by Jaffer » Mon May 17, 2010 3:07 pm

ToTheSea wrote:I really hate it when a film that should cover the entirety of the book it's based upon, is split up into two parts. Harry Potter & The Deathly Hallows, and Breaking Dawn, should be released as epics with long running-times.
Agreed. It is an insult to the target audience, as apart from the obvious financial benefits of splitting it up, they don't think teenagers can handle a three hour movie. Goodfellas, Apocalypse Now, Once Upon a time in America, all classic movies with long running times

Re: TWILIGHT MOVIE NEWS (GOOD AND BAD NEWS)!! COMMENT!

by x hayley x » Sun May 16, 2010 6:31 pm

I would personally be so happy if they do split Breaking Dawn into two films. I thought New Moon did not flow as well as it could have, I felt that particularly towards the end they had tried to squash too much into the little time that they had left. Since I had read the book first I noticed several things that had been cut out which I felt should have been in the film, but obviously had to be cut in order the get the film to an adequate length. I was actually thinking a few days ago that if New Moon seemed rushed, then how could they possibly turn Breaking Dawn into a flowing movie with it being even longer? I would be so glad if they do definitely make it into the 2 films as I think the quality and flow of the story would be far greater. That's just my opinion though! :)

Re: TWILIGHT MOVIE NEWS (GOOD AND BAD NEWS)!! COMMENT!

by ursha » Thu May 13, 2010 1:17 pm

Splitting into 2 movies sounds totally good to me. What I hate more is when there's 3/4 of the book missing in a movie. So that's fine with me...
About Ashley and Kellan...I don'0t want them out and what I'm wondering is how much of this is the truth. If they really want more money or that's just something we were told. And there are already maaaany pissed fans because of this. And like I read on one forum-it's normal that agents try to get as much money as possible, someone that works in the film industry said that things like this happen every day.
But Twilight without Ashley and Kellan is not Twilight anymore.

Top