by Mr Kennedy » Sun Nov 30, 2008 5:28 pm
Reav wrote:mymymy, don't take this the wrong way, but wishing it were authentic doesn't make it so! Even if half the people here ARE happy for you. If anyone could get their hands on the article in Autograph Collector regarding these JKRo signatures and scan it, it would be great.
If the article states its autopenned, then the article is wrong, autopens cannot creat an autograph like this one. Like Ive already said, its handsigned, by who can be debated, but it IS handsigned.
I find it hard we're even using Autograph Collector as a reputeable argument anyway, aren't these the same people that did an article proclaming Pacino's (or De Niro, I forget which) TTMs were legit, but in fact was just done for publicity?
[quote="Reav"]mymymy, don't take this the wrong way, but wishing it were authentic doesn't make it so! Even if half the people here ARE happy for you. If anyone could get their hands on the article in Autograph Collector regarding these JKRo signatures and scan it, it would be great.[/quote]
If the article states its autopenned, then the article is wrong, autopens cannot creat an autograph like this one. Like Ive already said, its handsigned, by who can be debated, but it IS handsigned.
I find it hard we're even using Autograph Collector as a reputeable argument anyway, aren't these the same people that did an article proclaming Pacino's (or De Niro, I forget which) TTMs were legit, but in fact was just done for publicity? :roll: