Mr Kennedy wrote:As far as the messy end of his autograph goes, I dont know how anyone can say that its authentic because of that, as the scan is so poor that you can't even make out that part of the autograph, so saying it matches one of his traits is misleading. I really dont see how anyone can claim the autograph in question is "messy" either, when its quite clearly far from it.
Just my opinion.
Well, I was just giving my quick opinion and I was going to come back to this topic with a full comparison... At least I said
why it
could be authentic, so far no one has really gave a good enough reason why it could be secretarial or authentic!
So if you don't like/understand my opinion, then you could rather say why you disagree instead of pointing out my "mistakes". {thumb2} It's not like you can't see the autograph also, but I try to at least give an opinion - take it or leave it.
So now I'm going to post pics and reasons:
Here's Daniel's
newest preprint photo he sends out TTM:
An
in person autograph from
AutographWorld:
Now comparing above known authentic examples to the one in this topic, I
personally think the whole "Daniel" part looks pretty good to me.
The "Radcliffe" part is a bit difficult to see so if Nathan could post a bigger scan, that would be great. {thumb2} But from what I could see, it seems to have certain characteristics that match authentic examples, such as the "R" and that little connection between the "d" and "c", but I would love to see a better scan as, if it's secretarial, I am pretty sure the "Radcliffe" part would give it away. It's pretty simple to sign "Daniel".
As for the younger Harry Potter signature, I really don't see it - if anyone could please be more specific that would be great. As far as I could see, it compares more to the new TTM preprint than older ones.
The only thing (which I totally forgot about in my previous post
) is that Daniel isn't very keen to sign "Harry Potter" items, although it's not like he doesn't sign
any, just not quite often. I would've thought he would rather send a preprint than signing a "Harry Potter" item...
That's one thing that makes me wonder a bit.
This is a difficult one to compare as his autograph is quite easy to forge, but you can compare to the pics we've posted in this thread and everyone can decide what they want to believe. {thumb2} I personally don't know anymore, I would like to see if there will be more successes from this address.
Thanks,
zanne
[quote="Mr Kennedy"]As far as the messy end of his autograph goes, I dont know how anyone can say that its authentic because of that, as the scan is so poor that you can't even make out that part of the autograph, so saying it matches one of his traits is misleading. I really dont see how anyone can claim the autograph in question is "messy" either, when its quite clearly far from it.
Just my opinion.[/quote]
Well, I was just giving my quick opinion and I was going to come back to this topic with a full comparison... At least I said [b]why[/b] it [i]could[/i] be authentic, so far no one has really gave a good enough reason why it could be secretarial or authentic! :? So if you don't like/understand my opinion, then you could rather say why you disagree instead of pointing out my "mistakes". {thumb2} It's not like you can't see the autograph also, but I try to at least give an opinion - take it or leave it.
So now I'm going to post pics and reasons:
Here's Daniel's [b]newest[/b] preprint photo he sends out TTM:
[url=http://img210.imageshack.us/my.php?image=ttmhi2.jpg][img]http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/2100/ttmhi2.th.jpg[/img][/url][url=http://g.imageshack.us/thpix.php][img]http://img210.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif[/img][/url]
An [b]in person[/b] autograph from [url=http://www.autographworld.com][b]AutographWorld[/b][/url]:
[url=http://img155.imageshack.us/my.php?image=getscaledimagern7.jpg][img]http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/93/getscaledimagern7.th.jpg[/img][/url][url=http://g.imageshack.us/thpix.php][img]http://img155.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif[/img][/url]
Now comparing above known authentic examples to the one in this topic, I [b]personally[/b] think the whole "Daniel" part looks pretty good to me. {up} The "Radcliffe" part is a bit difficult to see so if Nathan could post a bigger scan, that would be great. {thumb2} But from what I could see, it seems to have certain characteristics that match authentic examples, such as the "R" and that little connection between the "d" and "c", but I would love to see a better scan as, if it's secretarial, I am pretty sure the "Radcliffe" part would give it away. It's pretty simple to sign "Daniel".
As for the younger Harry Potter signature, I really don't see it - if anyone could please be more specific that would be great. As far as I could see, it compares more to the new TTM preprint than older ones. :?
The only thing (which I totally forgot about in my previous post :oops: ) is that Daniel isn't very keen to sign "Harry Potter" items, although it's not like he doesn't sign [i]any[/i], just not quite often. I would've thought he would rather send a preprint than signing a "Harry Potter" item... :? That's one thing that makes me wonder a bit.
This is a difficult one to compare as his autograph is quite easy to forge, but you can compare to the pics we've posted in this thread and everyone can decide what they want to believe. {thumb2} I personally don't know anymore, I would like to see if there will be more successes from this address. {up}
Thanks,
zanne
