Betty White Authentic?

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Try Amazon Music Unlimited 30-Day Free Trial

Image Search the message board Image

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Betty White Authentic?

by TheMailman » Sat Sep 09, 2006 9:48 am

But the funny thing is they resemble authentics. Her signature could have been studied though :|

by digi_girl » Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:04 am

well just an idea..if she were to carry around her mail in a bag..wouldn't the letter be postmarked from where she was filming?

And if she sent the autos back home and they were mailed from there, this would take alot of time and her reply couldn't be quick. It doesn't make sense to me. I guess we'll never know the truth though... 8)

by TheMailman » Fri Sep 08, 2006 8:17 pm

I don't understand :lol:

EDIT: I do now :D

by whosurdaddy » Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:57 pm

I have ocean front property in Arizona....

by TheMailman » Fri Sep 08, 2006 6:36 pm

Andy316 wrote:I read that the first time. if shes NOT IN THE COUNTRY, she CANT SIGN IT. Thats not ODD, thats IMPOSSIBLE.
LMAO :lol: I agree but that carryier bag she takes around with her wherever she goes, is that her 'mailbox' abroad then :D

by goldy » Fri Sep 08, 2006 6:06 pm

I think she is the one known for carryin an extra carry on bag, so she can sign during her vacations..

by RuleroftheWorld » Fri Sep 08, 2006 5:26 pm

rpbluesman wrote:
Andy316 wrote:Successes have been reported when she hasnt even been in the country, that is conclusive proof that they're secretarial. Its not even debateable!
As I have said before, and please, anyone reading this, please actually read it this time,

but no matter how odd the circumstances may seem, we never know unless we witness the signing for ourselves.
I read that the first time. if shes NOT IN THE COUNTRY, she CANT SIGN IT. Thats not ODD, thats IMPOSSIBLE.

by rpbluesman » Fri Sep 08, 2006 5:19 pm

Andy316 wrote:Successes have been reported when she hasnt even been in the country, that is conclusive proof that they're secretarial. Its not even debateable!
As I have said before, and please, anyone reading this, please actually read it this time,

but no matter how odd the circumstances may seem, we never know unless we witness the signing for ourselves.

by RuleroftheWorld » Fri Sep 08, 2006 5:10 pm

Successes have been reported when she hasnt even been in the country, that is conclusive proof that they're secretarial. Its not even debateable!

by TheMailman » Fri Sep 08, 2006 3:23 pm

Apologies for the small typo. I meant to say 'she would have no reason not to sign' :)

Thanks whosurdaddy {up}

Top