terry bradshaw awesome success

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: terry bradshaw awesome success

Re: terry bradshaw awesome success

by chadallen985 » Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:28 am

MJS73 wrote:PSA/DNA is just that, an opinion.

I know of at least two cases where items were signed at a show, walked over to the PSA/DNA table, and failed.

None of this changes the fact that Terry Bradshaw uses a ghost signer. And he's far from the only one. Send to Paul Konerko's house and see what you get back.

This reply is not all directed to MJS73, but I'm not gonna reply to each part numerous times. Part of this is also for CHIgrapher. Seriously dude, you need to grow up or go away. Don't be an idiot on here. If you dont want to hear what others say, then dont log in. Its that easy. I'm not looking to argue with anyone because I could care less what people really think about what I have to say, but I have to agree about the PSA part, it is an opinion. It's their opinion that an autograph is real or fake as much as it is my opinion that something is real or fake. Unless you seen an autograph get signed in person, you have NO WAY of knowing if its real or not. I know someone who sent a card into PSA and it came back saying it was fake, and it was a MLB player from the 50's who we got in person at a small town show. He called PSA and told them he was more than willing to send the autograph ticket and a picture of him with Mr. Dittmer at that show, and Jack showing the card.. as proof and they just said that they felt it wasnt real. It just shows that their "pros" aren't the greatest. Also, I sent a Barry Sanders RC in to get graded there once and it came back a PSA 6. I knew that card was much better than a 6, so I got the case opened and had a buddy of mine send the card in with some of his stuff, and it came back with a 9.5 grade. From a 6 to a 9.5???? That is another reason why I will never usa PSA because they get so many cards in there that they cant do the job that each card deserves to get.

As for Terry, like I said in my earlier post on here.. I asked Terry about it at the National and he basically admitted that he doesnt sign his fanmail. He is a guy who could care less what his fans think of him. Go back and read my reply on this post if you didn't read it yet. Thats all the proof I need to know that he's not signing them. When a guy gets paid $200+ to sign his name just once at a show, why would he be willing to sign for free TTM. Do the math. Especially someone like Terry who is in need of money.

So think what you want about the Terry autograph, but I know that if you sent it to him to sign, that its not real, but if you wanna think it is real, then enjoy your card. As for people giving their opinions on here about your items.. if you dont want opinions from others, then dont post your success on here.

Re: terry bradshaw awesome success

by MJS73 » Sat Dec 08, 2012 5:30 pm

PSA/DNA is just that, an opinion.

I know of at least two cases where items were signed at a show, walked over to the PSA/DNA table, and failed.

None of this changes the fact that Terry Bradshaw uses a ghost signer. And he's far from the only one. Send to Paul Konerko's house and see what you get back.

Re: terry bradshaw awesome success

by hlebain34 » Sat Dec 08, 2012 2:09 pm

And I have never paid money for an autograph that I didn't receive in person, and I never will. Not on Ebay, and not anywhere else. But the fact that autographs that are certified through these 3rd party companies draw in more money than autographs that don't really makes me question how you can say they are worthless? Sounds like the opposite of worthless to me.

Re: terry bradshaw awesome success

by hlebain34 » Sat Dec 08, 2012 2:01 pm

CHIgrapher wrote:
hlebain34 wrote:2. People using this website as a platform to brag about their successes, as opposed to using it for it's intended usage of sharing knowledge so that we may all expand our collections. IE: posting successes and not giving out the address used.

Awww.... People wont share addresses with you?!?!? :cry: :(

Did you tell your mommy that this is happening?!?!?


Some sense of entitlement you have there! Do you need an dictionary definition of what "entitlement" means?

Or have you already started doing your research?
You have to love when people resort to name calling. That is a very immature way to attempt to make a case. As far as entitlement; where did you gather that from? I just question what exactly the point is of posting succeses on here if you are unwilling to follow the forum rules in doing so. If you don't want to share information, that's fine, keep your success to yourself.

Re: terry bradshaw awesome success

by CHIgrapher » Sat Dec 08, 2012 12:34 pm

hlebain34 wrote:2. People using this website as a platform to brag about their successes, as opposed to using it for it's intended usage of sharing knowledge so that we may all expand our collections. IE: posting successes and not giving out the address used.

Awww.... People wont share addresses with you?!?!? :cry: :(

Did you tell your mommy that this is happening?!?!?


Some sense of entitlement you have there! Do you need an dictionary definition of what "entitlement" means?

Or have you already started doing your research?

Re: terry bradshaw awesome success

by CHIgrapher » Sat Dec 08, 2012 12:26 pm

MJS73 wrote:PSA/DNA has made their share of mistakes. Here's a clip from one of them:

Hot on the heels of their reported authentication of a fake Ty Cobb signature on a Little League ball made fifteen years after the Hall of Famer died (as reported by us on Deadspin last Friday), PSA/DNA has made another monumental authentication error. A Cobb item appearing on eBay for the past few weeks as an alleged cut signature of Cobb that was certified authentic and graded in one of PSAs air tight encapsulated holders was just pulled by eBay’s Fraud Investigation Team.

There are so many fake Bradshaw autographs they're starting to fail the IP autos. Google Terry Bradshaw ghostsigner and see what you come up with.


o·pin·ion - noun
1. a belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty.


id·i·ot - noun
1. an utterly foolish or senseless person.
Related Words for idiot - cretin, half-wit, imbecile, moron, Hlebian


There are countless examples of MJS73 story happening with PSA and JSA... the two "leaders" and "experts" in the 3rd party opinion authentication field!

Have you even looked at what a PSA or JSA cert says? In the first sentence or two they both say... "It is in our opinion". They do not say anything like... "It is 100% factual that this autograph is genuine."

Hlebian it is obvioius you are the one that needs to do the research and find the facts for yourself! Because all PSA and JSA give you are their "opinions". Their opinoins on authenticity are no more correct/fact than those that come from the typical hardcore autograph collector with decades of experience.


Here is a true factual story that I and other collectors have witnessed on many occasions... I am sure when you do some research (outside of Fanmail.biz) and start to educate yourself on the hobby of autograph collecting you will find more stories about this happening with PSA and JSA...

When PSA and JSA do on site authentication at shows, they pass hundreds of fakes each day!!! Here is what happens... Let's say Joe Montana is signing IP at a convention and PSA or JSA is set up at a nearby table to authenticate the items that were signed at the convention. There will be tons of shaddy dealers/collectors who will sneak fake Joe Montana autographed items into the authentication lines, play it off that they were just signed IP at the convention, and have them authenticated by PSA or JSA. They will then go and sell them on ebay at high prices to dumb collectors who don't know any better.


Hlebian, so next time you are on ebay paying big money for PSA or JSA authenticated items, keep that example in mind. As well as all the other negative things you will learn about these two companies through your research.


re·search
1. (Noun) diligent and systematic inquiry or investigation into a subject in order to discover or revise facts, theories, applications
2. (Verb) to make an extensive investigation into: to research a matter thoroughly instead of just using Fanmail.biz

Re: terry bradshaw awesome success

by MJS73 » Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:45 am

PSA/DNA has made their share of mistakes. Here's a clip from one of them:

Hot on the heels of their reported authentication of a fake Ty Cobb signature on a Little League ball made fifteen years after the Hall of Famer died (as reported by us on Deadspin last Friday), PSA/DNA has made another monumental authentication error. A Cobb item appearing on eBay for the past few weeks as an alleged cut signature of Cobb that was certified authentic and graded in one of PSAs air tight encapsulated holders was just pulled by eBay’s Fraud Investigation Team.

There are so many fake Bradshaw autographs they're starting to fail the IP autos. Google Terry Bradshaw ghostsigner and see what you come up with.

Re: terry bradshaw awesome success

by hlebain34 » Sat Dec 08, 2012 1:04 am

An outlining of things you wrote that do not make sense, since you requested it:
CHIgrapher wrote:
hlebain34 wrote: And as for CHIgrapher, you can't even write anything that makes sense.
CHIgrapher wrote:Thanks for the spelling correction guys.

Now if only your autograph knowledge was up to par.

Besides my spelling mistake... what part of my comments don't make sense to you.

- The fact that 3rd party authentication companies are for the most part a scam and a waste of money.
This is NOT a fact, this is your opinion. There is a difference. If you can provide CONCRETE "facts" do support your claim, please do so. One FACT that I can tell you, is that PSA/DNA certified autographs, sold on ebay auctions, consistently are sold for more than unverified autographed material. This is not my opinion, this is indeed a fact. Hopefully you are starting to grasp the difference between the two. This is a crushing blow to the scam and especially waste of money claim.
- The fact that Bradshaws TTMs are ghost signed.
This also cannot be a FACT, seeing as how no one can prove or disprove the claims (something essential to showing factuality, or lack there of) being made about these Bradshaw TTM autographs. The things being posted here are nothing more than heresay. Heresay, by definition, is not necessarily factual information:


hear·say
[heer-sey]

noun
1.
unverified, unofficial information gained or acquired from another and not part of one's direct knowledge.

2.
an item of idle or unverified information or gossip; rumor: a malicious hearsay.



- The fact that some of you guys have no clue what you are talking about.
All of the sudden, it appears it is you that does not know what you are talking about.


There are 2 things, and 2 things only, that will make me go on occasional rants on this board:
1. What is happening on this thread. Like I said before, to me, this is a hobby that is fun to me. For many others, this board is for nothing more than peeing in people's Cheerios.
2. People using this website as a platform to brag about their successes, as opposed to using it for it's intended usage of sharing knowledge so that we may all expand our collections. IE: posting successes and not giving out the address used.

Re: terry bradshaw awesome success

by mahumada » Fri Dec 07, 2012 9:29 pm

Nato64 wrote:Well, seeing as how that NO ONE can prove if it is his brother or his self signing the items TTM, you can't say 100% that is or is not Bradshaw signing it. I would rather have a third party that has built a reputation for being the most acuurate one can come to authentication like PSA than take the word of a faceless screenname on an internet website. For all we know, you could be one that gets bradshaws autgraph monthly and then turns around and sells them on ebay and you are trying to pursuade seekers from sending to him so he isn't overwhelmed and stops signing. Then your cashcow would be gone. Noone can prove that nor can you disprove it. As for being a "uniformed" or uninformed collector, I have learned one thing....No one individuals opinion on here matters whether or not they believe a signature is real. That's like the time I met Frank Gore and i posted the success on here. I met and shook the mans hand, even have photos of the meeting. I posted the signed dollar bill and i had 5 different individuals tell me that it was fake and that it was ghost signed. Yeah, that's some GREAT opinions to listen too!
Well said. {up} {up} {up} {up}

Re: terry bradshaw awesome success

by CHIgrapher » Fri Dec 07, 2012 9:22 pm

hlebain34 wrote: And as for CHIgrapher, you can't even write anything that makes sense.
CHIgrapher wrote:Thanks for the spelling correction guys.

Now if only your autograph knowledge was up to par.

Besides my spelling mistake... what part of my comments don't make sense to you.

- The fact that 3rd party authentication companies are for the most part a scam and a waste of money.
- The fact that Bradshaws TTMs are ghost signed.
- The fact that some of you guys have no clue what you are talking about.


I'm guessing its that last point you are having a hard time dealing with.

Top