Jason Statham via Transporter 3 Sucess !! (Scan)

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Try Amazon Music Unlimited Free Trial

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Image Search the message board Image

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Jason Statham via Transporter 3 Sucess !! (Scan)

Re: Jason Statham via Transporter 3 Sucess !! (Scan)

by northwellguy » Fri May 24, 2019 1:56 am

Oh man not another one
This thread is over 11 years old!
Are you really trying to give info to someone 11 years later??????????????

Re: Jason Statham via Transporter 3 Sucess !! (Scan)

by RuleroftheWorld » Thu May 23, 2019 10:16 pm

superletterfan wrote: Andy, what's your opinion about the 2 photos i previously got?
Yours seem to hold up well, the only thing that concerns me is the "To:" part. Virtually the only people who use that double dotted thing after "to" are secretaries. Yours are certainly much more likely to be real than the one in this thread though.

Re: Jason Statham via Transporter 3 Sucess !! (Scan)

by superletterfan » Wed Jun 04, 2008 1:39 pm

Andy316 wrote:
superletterfan wrote:He has lots of variations. Wonder my ones would possibly be real... ;-)
No, he really doesnt. All his autographs have the same basic shape and stucture, they just vary depending on whether hes rushed or not.

Andy, what's your opinion about the 2 photos i previously got?

Re: Jason Statham via Transporter 3 Sucess !! (Scan)

by RuleroftheWorld » Wed Jun 04, 2008 11:25 am

superletterfan wrote:He has lots of variations. Wonder my ones would possibly be real... ;-)
No, he really doesnt. All his autographs have the same basic shape and stucture, they just vary depending on whether hes rushed or not.

Re: Jason Statham via Transporter 3 Sucess !! (Scan)

by superletterfan » Wed Jun 04, 2008 11:22 am

He has lots of variations. Wonder my ones would possibly be real... ;-)

Re: Jason Statham via Transporter 3 Sucess !! (Scan)

by RuleroftheWorld » Wed Jun 04, 2008 8:18 am

All of those were obtained in person, so depending on how rushed he was, his autograph will be messier in some. Yours was through the mail, he wouldve probably been seated and not rushed, yet still resembles none of them. It doesnt follow basic shape or pattern either. I think its safe to say it wasnt done with his hand.

Re: Jason Statham via Transporter 3 Sucess !! (Scan)

by Missytik » Tue Jun 03, 2008 6:10 pm

Well it must have been his assistant maybe... {down}
Fair enough they sent back something.
Was hoping it was real ... :mad:
I found anothers from Autographworld and it changes :

Image
Image
Image

Weird They are all different ... {down}

Well too bad for me anyhow .... or not :razz: :razz: :razz:

Re: Jason Statham via Transporter 3 Sucess !! (Scan)

by RuleroftheWorld » Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:20 pm

Heres an IP one from autographworld. Looks nothing like the one you got unfortunately.

Image

Re: Jason Statham via Transporter 3 Sucess !! (Scan)

by Missytik » Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:02 pm

superletterfan wrote:The auto you got was quite different from mine. See here:

http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic.php?t=72346

Weird!
Yes that'is quite wierd ... :? Maybe he signs in different ways ?? :shock: But I compared the a-i-e of both our names and the e-e of "cheers" and "see" and they look quite the same ... but I never studied penmanship before :oops:
When I recieved my success I looked for IP's of him on the web and found only one (it's an e-bay seller "who claims" it's an IP) :


Image

Re: Jason Statham via Transporter 3 Sucess !! (Scan)

by superletterfan » Wed May 28, 2008 2:15 am

The auto you got was quite different from mine. See here:

http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic.php?t=72346

Weird!

Top