Arnold Palmer Success

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Try Amazon Prime 30-Day Free Trial - Watch Thousands of Movies & TV Shows Anytime

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Image Search the message board Image

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Arnold Palmer Success

Re: Arnold Palmer Success

by DiamondDave » Tue Feb 11, 2014 11:59 pm

CHIgrapher wrote:Funny how your account of that story isn't what is shown in these posts.

According to the screen grab I was sent and looking at the link... the TRUTH all stems from this...

You were crying and throwing a temper tantrum over the fact that you TLJ posts kept on getting moved to the trash, because you were violating forum rules and not posting the address that was used from your "success".

And like a little boy in his terrible twos you just kept on reposting the same success over and over again until a Admin or Mod justified the reason why they kept on getting moved to the trash. When the reason is clearly spelled out in the rules.


But that is neither here nor there...

what this all boils down to DiamonDave... or should I say son... let me let you in on a valuable internet secret.

If my post bothers you that much.....ignore them, don't comment on them.
Doing so only make you look far worse than the person you're trying to insult.

You've convinced yourself that you're invaluable to this site. How can anyone have a sensible discussion with someone like that?
I'm quite sure there's a wealth of quotable CHIgrapher posts out there. There will be plenty in the future to call out as needed without me even bothering to seek them out.
How's that admin application coming?
It's very obvious who here has the upper hand at this point. You've become so flustered it's down right pathetic.
You're grasping at straws in the hope of somehow justifying your need to be a troll, or the simple fact that I'm the one that has gotten to you this much. You simply can't let it go.

I'll just kick back and enjoy all this room in your mind.
But again, I bet you're salivating at the keyboard awaiting my reply......

Re: Arnold Palmer Success

by CHIgrapher » Tue Feb 11, 2014 11:48 pm

Zaj wrote:Arnold Palmer is WELL known to send out autopens.... Even PSA has weighed in on it, "Unfortunately, Palmer has resorted to using an autopen machine from time to time, which signs his name for him when receiving autograph requests in the mail." http://www.psaautographfacts.com/Autogr ... old-palmer

Thanks Zaj for offering some truthful insight, but unfortunately it will fall on deaf ears to certain members on here.

That was one of the many links above that I posted as evidence to back up the fact his successes were APs.

And TheArtist had the smoking gun with side by side comparisons... two exactly the same AP matrices in every way.


Keep up the good fight and letting members know who to NOT waste their time and money on sending TTMs to!

It will only make this forum a more reliable source for collectors who want authentic autographs.

Re: Arnold Palmer Success

by DiamondDave » Tue Feb 11, 2014 11:46 pm

Zaj wrote:Arnold Palmer is WELL known to send out autopens.... Even PSA has weighed in on it, "Unfortunately, Palmer has resorted to using an autopen machine from time to time
You contradict yourself within the quote you've presented.

I'm not saying they are 100% legitimate. I don't know that 100%. Neither do you, nor any of the trolls that attempt to prey on posters on this site. Not one of us was present.
I did not ask for any opinion or confirmation/denial.

Re: Arnold Palmer Success

by Zaj » Tue Feb 11, 2014 11:40 pm

Arnold Palmer is WELL known to send out autopens.... Even PSA has weighed in on it, "Unfortunately, Palmer has resorted to using an autopen machine from time to time, which signs his name for him when receiving autograph requests in the mail." http://www.psaautographfacts.com/Autogr ... old-palmer

Re: Arnold Palmer Success

by CHIgrapher » Tue Feb 11, 2014 11:39 pm

Funny how your account of that story isn't what is shown in these posts.

According to the screen grab I was sent and looking at the link... the TRUTH all stems from this...

You were crying and throwing a temper tantrum over the fact that you TLJ posts kept on getting moved to the trash, because you were violating forum rules and not posting the address that was used from your "success".

And like a little boy in his terrible twos you just kept on reposting the same success over and over again until a Admin or Mod justified the reason why they kept on getting moved to the trash. When the reason is clearly spelled out in the rules.


But that is neither here nor there...

what this all boils down to DiamonDave... or should I say son... let me let you in on a valuable internet secret.

If my post bothers you that much.....ignore them, don't comment on them.
Doing so only make you look far worse than the person you're trying to insult.

Re: Arnold Palmer Success

by dancingirl1 » Tue Feb 11, 2014 11:37 pm

DiamondDave wrote:At least you attempt some sort of witty reply. All dancingirl! can do is copy your quotes.
If I agree with them, that's what I will do. U are always worried about me and I love it lol!

Re: Arnold Palmer Success

by DiamondDave » Tue Feb 11, 2014 11:33 pm

Normanbotts wrote:Hey Dave I think People come here to purposely declare stuff as fake.
Some people must have been in the room when they were signed.
It's Good to know ain't it.
But some folks are turning newbies and other forum posters away with confrontational posts. They won't allow people to learn on their own without the apparent joy people get out of declaring their efforts a "fake". one can disagree or offer opinion without being rude or pompous....or even confrontational. I expect some are very young and immature so don't worry about these guys they aren't worth it mate
I appreciate the kind words and thoughts.
Best of luck!

Re: Arnold Palmer Success

by Normanbotts » Tue Feb 11, 2014 11:30 pm

Hey Dave I think People come here to purposely declare stuff as fake.
Some people must have been in the room when they were signed.
It's Good to know ain't it.
But some folks are turning newbies and other forum posters away with confrontational posts. They won't allow people to learn on their own without the apparent joy people get out of declaring their efforts a "fake". one can disagree or offer opinion without being rude or pompous....or even confrontational. I expect some are very young and immature so don't worry about these guys they aren't worth it mate

Re: Arnold Palmer Success

by DiamondDave » Tue Feb 11, 2014 11:26 pm

CHIgrapher wrote:
DiamondDave wrote:
CHIgrapher wrote:Screen shot of your signature sent to the site Admins and Mods.
Okay.

Who is getting to whom?
It's time for this board to be rid of arrogant, condescending trolls.
I'm simply standing up myself.
Oh...and enjoying all this rent free space in your minds.

It doesn't.

Another member suggested it via PM along with several other amusing/hypocritical things about you.


Like this previous post from you on internet etiquette....




Forum: Is My Autograph Authentic? Topic: Tommy Lee Jones Success

DiamondDave

Post subject: Re: Tommy Lee Jones Success

Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2013 5:21 pm


"Son...let me let you in on a valuable internet secret.

If a post bothers you that much.....ignore it, don't open it, don't comment on it.
Doing so only make you look far worse than the person you're trying to insult.

Good day."




And you are so quick to call others trolls... maybe take your own advice?

dancinggirl and I bother you so much... yet you always comment on what we have to say? Hmmmmm.... Interesting.
Again, that rent free space continues to grow amongst the forum trolls on this site. It's wonderful to have this much space. And, to know that people care enough about what I have to say, that they've saved old posts.
So, I'll briefly discuss that post, a post where I refused to provide a private address, which made said trolls declare it not feedback. Oh, and of course, declare it "fake". Nothing to be ashamed of. No condescension, no arrogance, I stood by my post and attempted to defend it. Ultimately I gave up. Don't worry, I'm not giving up on you just yet.
Care to let me know who shared the post with you? It's always nice to know who's mind your residing in rent free. I'll even add them to my signature. Don't worry CHIgrapher, I'll be sure to let you know when I do, so you can forward another screenshot to the admin & mods.

At least you attempt some sort of witty reply. All dancingirl! can do is copy your quotes.

It's you that continues to stir the pot here, not I. It's vaguely sad that I get to you and the other trolls so easily. It's really not that hard to do.

Re: Arnold Palmer Success

by dancingirl1 » Tue Feb 11, 2014 11:12 pm

CHIgrapher wrote: dancinggirl and I bother you so much... yet you always comment on what we have to say? Hmmmmm.... Interesting.

Top