J.K. Rowling Generic Success/Fail

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: J.K. Rowling Generic Success/Fail

Re: J.K. Rowling Generic Success/Fail

by Guest » Thu May 08, 2025 12:31 am

Arabella pyant wrote: ↑Wed Apr 23, 2025 9:33 pm Dear JK Rowling

I am writing you this letter on a mistake that you have made on the philosopher stone. In chapter 1 page 2 you said the the story starts " dull gray, Tuesday morning" in 1981. So it should be the 1st November 1981 after the death of Harry's parents. But if you look and see what the day of the week is on the 1st November it is a Sunday. In a mater of fact you have not got all the information that you should of needed. I just want to inform you of this mistake.

You're sincerely

Re: J.K. Rowling Generic Success/Fail

by Arabella pyant » Wed Apr 23, 2025 9:33 pm

Dear JK Rowling

I am writing you this letter on a mistake that you have made on the philosopher stone. In chapter 1 page 2 you said the the story starts " dull gray, Tuesday morning" in 1981. So it should be the 1st November 1981 after the death of Harry's parents. But if you look and see what the day of the week is on the 1st November it is a Sunday. In a mater of fact you have not got all the information that you should of needed. I just want to inform you of this mistake.

You're sincerely Arabella pyant

Re: J.K. Rowling Generic Success/Fail

by C1RQU1T » Wed Sep 18, 2013 7:12 am

ttmcollector wrote:
Kyle6 wrote:Wait, why isn't this an authentic autograph?
Probably a mail merge, template letter prob. w/ a digital signature...
Yeah that is exactly what it is :mrgreen: {up}

Re: J.K. Rowling Generic Success/Fail

by ttmcollector » Wed Sep 18, 2013 3:09 am

Kyle6 wrote:Wait, why isn't this an authentic autograph?
Probably a mail merge, template letter prob. w/ a digital signature...

Re: J.K. Rowling Generic Success/Fail

by C1RQU1T » Tue Sep 17, 2013 6:16 am

Kyle6 wrote:
C1RQU1T wrote:Kyle6 this is not an Authentic success it is a preprint letter :) but it is still a great success ! :)
I just thought seeing as her name was on it that it was authentic. They must have a ton of names already on letters or something lol
No, The letter is typed by a Sec and the Sig is just a print

Re: J.K. Rowling Generic Success/Fail

by Kyle6 » Tue Sep 17, 2013 3:55 am

C1RQU1T wrote:Kyle6 this is not an Authentic success it is a preprint letter :) but it is still a great success ! :)
I just thought seeing as her name was on it that it was authentic. They must have a ton of names already on letters or something lol

Re: J.K. Rowling Generic Success/Fail

by C1RQU1T » Tue Sep 17, 2013 3:35 am

Kyle6 this is not an Authentic success it is a preprint letter :) but it is still a great success ! :)

Re: J.K. Rowling Generic Success/Fail

by Kyle6 » Tue Sep 17, 2013 3:03 am

Wait, why isn't this an authentic autograph?

J.K. Rowling Generic Success/Fail

by LizzietheCollector » Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:50 am

Sent: LOR, SAE - June/July 2013
Received: Printed letter - 9/16/13

Address Used:
I really can't remember and it has been removed from the database so I'm sorry.

Letter & Envelope:
Image
Image

I am happy to receive something back, which means my letter did make it over seas, plus being a Harry Potter fan getting anything back still makes me happy. I knew I had no chance of getting an authentic auto since those are 1 in a million, but i still had to give it a shot lol.

Top