Hugh Jackman success

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Hugh Jackman success

Re: Hugh Jackman success

by striker20 » Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:25 pm

Yeah, that's his typical autopen.

Re: Hugh Jackman success

by ericnreanna » Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:01 pm

Very nice congrats still waiting on mine

Re: Hugh Jackman success

by Meow » Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:43 pm

It's a great pic and at least you got something back. He was great in Les Miserables.

Re: Hugh Jackman success

by admin » Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:28 pm

Hi davseb66 :)

Thank you for your feedback {up} Great Success :P

You have been added to the list for the $10 gift certificate.

{star} Hugh Jackman on Fanmail.biz | Previous Feedback(s) Received

Fanmail 8)

Re: Hugh Jackman success

by LeeIAm » Mon Jan 21, 2013 8:57 pm

True, the fact that it looks the same is even more proof that it is an autopen.

Re: Hugh Jackman success

by Twelveby12 » Mon Jan 21, 2013 7:59 pm

...and the reason only one came back is because they don't autopen both in an attempt to let you believe it's the real deal.

I have double checked this incidentally, without doubt its an AP, sorry.

Re: Hugh Jackman success

by georgethree33 » Mon Jan 21, 2013 7:54 pm

Because it's not similar - it's the same. That's why. There's no variation with autopens.

Re: Hugh Jackman success

by James » Mon Jan 21, 2013 7:14 pm

davseb66 wrote:The signature looks like the others, then why the machine?
It's the same as the others because it was done by a machine. Simples.

Re: Hugh Jackman success

by davseb66 » Mon Jan 21, 2013 7:08 pm

It is up to you to believe if it is a forgery or the truth, for me it is the truth I compared with of other one on fanmail and on other site and it is the same writing.
The signature looks like the others, then why the machine?

Re: Hugh Jackman success

by georgethree33 » Mon Jan 21, 2013 6:55 pm

which is only further proof that it's autopen. Very typical to "sign" only one. Spanky Taylor does that with almost every request - if he used the machine to sign two - it would be a dead giveaway right from the start. The autograph is fake. compare it to the other jackman "successes" on this site - it'll match with machine perfection - it's an autopen.

Top