by FCM » Wed Dec 13, 2017 2:44 pm
dancingirl1 wrote:Question: why did you put "finally" because two months is VERY quick success...
congrats by the way again.
Yes, two months is a quick success! However, I got two sendbacks and tried three addresses before this! I first send out in June, and when I received an RTS, it was not only an RTS from the address I had first sent to, but another address someone had taped over the first one. Though that may sound confusing, it means that when the letter was received, a manager or secretary wanted to send it back since the company was no longer supporting Ms. Niketa Calame, but they were thoughtful and put an address they thought would work on top of the one I used, then put that in the mailbox. That address didn't work either, and I got an RTS. I tried another address, and that only made me get a second RTS.
So, by "finally," I do not mean waiting time, but multiple efforts and tries.

[quote="dancingirl1"]Question: why did you put "finally" because two months is VERY quick success...
congrats by the way again.[/quote]
Yes, two months is a quick success! However, I got two sendbacks and tried three addresses before this! I first send out in June, and when I received an RTS, it was not only an RTS from the address I had first sent to, but another address someone had taped over the first one. Though that may sound confusing, it means that when the letter was received, a manager or secretary wanted to send it back since the company was no longer supporting Ms. Niketa Calame, but they were thoughtful and put an address they thought would work on top of the one I used, then put that in the mailbox. That address didn't work either, and I got an RTS. I tried another address, and that only made me get a second RTS.
So, by "finally," I do not mean waiting time, but multiple efforts and tries. {up}