by Normanbotts » Thu Jan 29, 2015 11:12 am
cjhanson wrote:Normanbotts wrote:Ignore cjhanson all he ever posts is too say other people successes are secs.
He says it every post he posts
It's real.
It's too neat and controlled to be authentic. Her authentic signature is a bit on the messy side. You need to have the eye for it, and unfortunately you don't have it.
Here's the real thing, which is obviously nowhere near that very neat and controlled secretarial:

Well that's your opinion so if you want to think that then great. You believe what you want.
My opinion is it's real and she signed it as I have checked and studied it and compared it with her ip,s. So I'm I'm pretty positive and certain I'm right!
[quote="cjhanson"][quote="Normanbotts"]Ignore cjhanson all he ever posts is too say other people successes are secs.
He says it every post he posts
It's real.[/quote]
It's too neat and controlled to be authentic. Her authentic signature is a bit on the messy side. You need to have the eye for it, and unfortunately you don't have it.
Here's the real thing, which is obviously nowhere near that very neat and controlled secretarial:
[img]http://www.xpautographs.com/12580-8965-thickbox/shirley-maclaine-autograph.jpg[/img][/quote]
Well that's your opinion so if you want to think that then great. You believe what you want. {up}
My opinion is it's real and she signed it as I have checked and studied it and compared it with her ip,s. So I'm I'm pretty positive and certain I'm right!