by luckyas13canbe » Mon Jun 17, 2013 7:21 pm
reachingrwanda2014 wrote:luckyas13canbe wrote:reachingrwanda2014 wrote:HELLO AGAIN GUYS,
TO ANSWER A POST, THE REASON I PUT THE POST UP WAS NUMBER 1, IT'S A SUCCESS, I'VE RECEIVED SOMETHING THROUGH THE POST.
THANK YOU FOR THE MESSAGES
LEWIS
Hey Lewis,
The thing is ... it's NOT a success, because it's not a genuine signature. For it to be a success it either has to be signed by the person you wrote to.
Im not going to get into any peti arguments will people on this forum,
I'm here to share EVERYTHING i recieve for my charity
thanks
lewis
Dude, there's nothing petty, and it's not an argument. The bottom line is you're not going to be auctioning that any more than a pic of Brad Pitt that you signed yourself. I'll say again, your charity work is commendable, I know how tough it is to get awesome items in, but there's no point posting sec responses, charity response or not.
[quote="reachingrwanda2014"][quote="luckyas13canbe"][quote="reachingrwanda2014"]HELLO AGAIN GUYS,
TO ANSWER A POST, THE REASON I PUT THE POST UP WAS NUMBER 1, IT'S A SUCCESS, I'VE RECEIVED SOMETHING THROUGH THE POST.
THANK YOU FOR THE MESSAGES
LEWIS[/quote]
Hey Lewis,
The thing is ... it's NOT a success, because it's not a genuine signature. For it to be a success it either has to be signed by the person you wrote to.[/quote]
Im not going to get into any peti arguments will people on this forum,
I'm here to share EVERYTHING i recieve for my charity
thanks
lewis[/quote]
Dude, there's nothing petty, and it's not an argument. The bottom line is you're not going to be auctioning that any more than a pic of Brad Pitt that you signed yourself. I'll say again, your charity work is commendable, I know how tough it is to get awesome items in, but there's no point posting sec responses, charity response or not.