Daniel Radcliffe PP Back :D

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Daniel Radcliffe PP Back :D

Re: Daniel Radcliffe PP Back :D

by Twelveby12 » Tue Jan 22, 2013 4:19 pm

yunian wrote:
Twelveby12 wrote:Nope, I just wish this one would stop jumping back to the top of the page every day when someone posts "if you believe its real its real" or "pps are awesome".

Seriously, all I did was point out you could have saved yourself some money by printing one yourself. You could even have chosen the image. But hey, apparently that's not allowed these days.
I can understand you, but I've never felt that " if you believe its real its real " or " pps are awesome ",
I know it is a lie, I just hope that people with similar interests can be friendly to each other. :D
I know YOU haven't ;) Don't worry. And it was never my intention to unfriendly towards you :D

RM

Re: Daniel Radcliffe PP Back :D

by yunian » Tue Jan 22, 2013 3:02 pm

Twelveby12 wrote:Nope, I just wish this one would stop jumping back to the top of the page every day when someone posts "if you believe its real its real" or "pps are awesome".

Seriously, all I did was point out you could have saved yourself some money by printing one yourself. You could even have chosen the image. But hey, apparently that's not allowed these days.
I can understand you, but I've never felt that " if you believe its real its real " or " pps are awesome ",
I know it is a lie, I just hope that people with similar interests can be friendly to each other. :D

Re: Daniel Radcliffe PP Back :D

by Twelveby12 » Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:09 pm

Nope, I just wish this one would stop jumping back to the top of the page every day when someone posts "if you believe its real its real" or "pps are awesome".

Seriously, all I did was point out you could have saved yourself some money by printing one yourself. You could even have chosen the image. But hey, apparently that's not allowed these days.

Re: Daniel Radcliffe PP Back :D

by yunian » Tue Jan 22, 2013 11:00 am

Twelveby12 wrote:
Meow wrote:I have one too. Stop spoiling the excitement of getting a new picture. Put yourself in this persons shoes. How would you feel.
Seriously? This is STILL going on?

I'll tell you how I would feel. **** off. Even more so if I lived abroad and had spent more on postage. But then, I tend to do my research and it's well known that Dan sends PPs. Anyway, if the OP is happy, fine, but I reserve the right to advise members to save their money and print a PP themselves.
It seems that you are hoping to go to each of the PP feedback's post reply to others " you are stupid waste of money and time ",
and then you will be happy ? ;-)

Re: Daniel Radcliffe PP Back :D

by Twelveby12 » Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:00 pm

Meow wrote:I have one too. Stop spoiling the excitement of getting a new picture. Put yourself in this persons shoes. How would you feel.
Seriously? This is STILL going on?

I'll tell you how I would feel. Pissed off. Even more so if I lived abroad and had spent more on postage. But then, I tend to do my research and it's well known that Dan sends PPs. Anyway, if the OP is happy, fine, but I reserve the right to advise members to save their money and print a PP themselves.

Re: Daniel Radcliffe PP Back :D

by Meow » Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:49 pm

I have one too. Stop spoiling the excitement of getting a new picture. Put yourself in this persons shoes. How would you feel.

Re: Daniel Radcliffe PP Back :D

by yunian » Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:08 pm

JenPotterhead wrote:Quite frankly, if it's a PP or Authentic, I consider it a success, after all, you got something back. It may not be considered a full success, but it is a success of some sort. People have different opinions on this matter, and thats fair enough, sometimes though I wish people could keep their opinions to themselves. The person who received the PP knew it was a preprint..at least they weren't claiming it to be real when it clearly isn't.
Congrats on the SUCCESS :)
Don't let some rude little people ruin the fun for you.
Thats another point, Autograph collecting should be fun :/ I don't see why people have to be so rude a lot of the time. You're among people who share the same hobby as you, sure, some may be newbies at it and not know much about it, but even so...
Thank you very much ! :D

Re: Daniel Radcliffe PP Back :D

by yunian » Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:06 pm

Okay, since then I have nothing to say, :neutral:
I just want to express my feedback, and not to show off how it was amazing, :roll:
I have come back from Canada 's VV, although the same PP, :?
I want to say is, I received a letter back, or got no reply is still somewhat different. ;-)

Re: Daniel Radcliffe PP Back :D

by IzaBellatrix » Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:06 am

Twelveby12 wrote:It's not about being rude, but then if you have your opinion I have mine.

For me this is not a success for the two reasons pointed out...

1... It's not a signature, and it's something you could print yourself
2... It's nothing to do with Dan, the letter didn't get to him, he didn't see it, and most likely a work experience kid put the photo in the SASE

I understand in the cases where no one knows if a PP will come back that a chance is taken, but I honestly don't see why people waste money sending to someone they know will 100% send one back. If you're playing the "fanmail" angle, then fine it's a response, but the purpose of fanmail is that the letter gets to the person you're writing to. We all know these don't. As Dan signs VV, it's a mystery to me why anyone uses the ARG address.
100% agree. So it's waste of money.

Re: Daniel Radcliffe Success :D

by Lilly-May » Sun Jan 20, 2013 1:14 pm

Twelveby12 wrote:
Lilly-May wrote:Is it on photo paper or regular printer paper? it's just there seems to be a tea stain on the corner and I'm not sure it would damage photo paper like that.
Looks like the whole item is heavily damaged in transit, but it will be on photo paper, all Dan's PPs are.
Aah, thanks! Just looked a bit like regular printer paper...

Top