Hulk Hogan success

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Hulk Hogan success

Re: Hulk Hogan success

by cagneyfan » Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:51 pm

I know that I am new to this site and I don't mean to belittle anyone, but i have a suggestion. Could the Feedback index be divided into two sections, one for strictly authentic collectors and one for those who are happy receiving at least something? Just an idea - maybe a suggestion for an administrator - just trying to possibly help make this a more productive and informative site.

Re: Hulk Hogan success

by JonathanMarc » Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:03 pm

jamiso wrote:I concur, SEC forgeries are the biggest slap in the face. I'm really sorry fans like you are treated that way. It definitely mocks the fan's intellectuality. I also think it is a way for them to encourage collectors to not write to them anymore because the results are clearly fraud. I would much rather receive a pre-print, or even better, a note from the SEC telling me that "so & so" is unable to sign ttm instead of forging his/her signature. smh..
{up}

Re: Hulk Hogan success

by jamiso » Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:47 pm

I concur, SEC forgeries are the biggest slap in the face. I'm really sorry fans like you are treated that way. It definitely mocks the fan's intellectuality. I also think it is a way for them to encourage collectors to not write to them anymore because the results are clearly fraud. I would much rather receive a pre-print, or even better, a note from the SEC telling me that "so & so" is unable to sign ttm instead of forging his/her signature. smh..

Re: Hulk Hogan success

by JonathanMarc » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:33 pm

cagneyfan wrote:You are right - I only had my suspicions since I am not a sports collector also. Thanks for verifying and it helps me because I don't want to have anything that's bogus. Feel free to help me out with any of my entries.
You are a rare breed of collector - at least on this site. People get so bent out of shape when they are told they have a sec/PP, but wouldn't you be better off knowing the truth? I want to know if I have a legit graph or not.

Re: Hulk Hogan success

by mantas » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:22 pm

i mean i wanted to write next year and yes....now i know it's useless.....

my english grrrrrr 8)

Re: Hulk Hogan success

by CHIgrapher » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:08 pm

mantas wrote: i would write to him on january. {down} :?

???

Writing to him in January is not going to make a difference. Either is sending to a different address.

They will always come back with the same ghost signature.

Hogan has even admited IP to not even seeing/signing his fanmail.

Re: Hulk Hogan success

by mantas » Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:43 pm

cagneyfan wrote:My personal opinion is that these so called secretaries have some nerve signing someone else's name to something. I would rather get the item back with a form letter that states the celebrity does not sign TTM.
yes that's right.everything else is illusion and false hope.pity, i would write to him on january.okay now has been settled {down} :?

Re: Hulk Hogan success

by CHIgrapher » Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:24 pm

cagneyfan wrote:You are right - I only had my suspicions since I am not a sports collector also. Thanks for verifying and it helps me because I don't want to have anything that's bogus. Feel free to help me out with any of my entries.

If more members on here were like cagneyfan... this forum would be sooo much better!

Instead it's kind of become a joke to the rest of the collecting world.

Re: Hulk Hogan success

by cagneyfan » Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:34 pm

My personal opinion is that these so called secretaries have some nerve signing someone else's name to something. I would rather get the item back with a form letter that states the celebrity does not sign TTM.

Re: Hulk Hogan success

by dancingirl1 » Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:39 am

knicksfannumba1 wrote:Secs are the biggest slap in the face because it's like the celebrity is trying to insult fan's intelligence, but some people don't hate secretarials and some even consider it a success... Which I have no clue why. :roll:
THIS 100%!

You also said "some people wouldn't mind a sec." Do you know how those people are:

*Young people*

* delusional people who pass it off as real*

LOL but I do agree with you!

Top