by cschultz-2 » Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:41 pm
Yes, congratulations!
Before anyone weighs in with the opinion that the signature on the photo is secretarial, the result of a writing machine, or inauthentic in any way, I took a look at a few genuine Clint Eastwood autographs a minute ago and the handwriting on your photo is--with a few modifications we can attribute to age, environment, and human conditioning--almost precisely identical to all the other authentic Eastwood signatures I've seen.
In other words, that's Clint Eastwood's actual handwriting on your photo. Congratulations again!
Yes, congratulations!
Before anyone weighs in with the opinion that the signature on the photo is secretarial, the result of a writing machine, or inauthentic in any way, I took a look at a few genuine Clint Eastwood autographs a minute ago and the handwriting on your photo is--with a few modifications we can attribute to age, environment, and human conditioning--almost precisely identical to all the other authentic Eastwood signatures I've seen.
In other words, that's Clint Eastwood's actual handwriting on your photo. Congratulations again!